And here are the community guides for the majority of providers. It still
may be a service they need to enable / accept on their end.
http://www.onesc.net/communities/
-- http://dcp.dcptech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > Tech Guy > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:58 PM > To: Paul Negron > Cc: Fake Name; Tyson Scott; Cisco certification > Subject: Re: bgp 2 isp question > > I have to disagree with both Paul & Tyson. > > My real word answer is that AS-prepend will not always do the job for > you (no matter how many you prepend), when you want to use the second > ISP connection purely as the backup. > > This is because the ISP may by default always prefer the routes > advertise from their customers, over the one learnt from other ISP and > the Internet, disregard of the AS path. The end result is that they > will always send traffic back to you via the direct peering. This is > particular true if the ISP config follows the RFC1998. In this case, > if you want to use the second ISP connection as backup you need to > send them an agreed community to lower their local preference. You'd > better check with both ISP for their specific design guideline. > > My best practice (without having to worry about the ISP design) is to > send more specific (/24 subnets) to the primary ISP, and only the > summary (/23) to the second ISP. The config you proposed is OK, but > you need to make sure that you have outbound prefix-list or route-map > to stop /24 from being advertised to the second ISP. By default, > without those filter-list (assuming your two routers have iBGP peering > with each other) both /24 and /23 will be advertised to both ISP, and > you will not get the desired goal. > > > More info on RFC1998 below > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1998 > > 4. A Real-World Implementation Example > > MCI currently makes heavy use of the BGP "LOCAL_PREF" attribute > value > as part of its routing policy configuration process. Different BGP > "LOCAL_PREF" values are assigned for routes from different sources. > Table 1 details these values: > > > +-------------------------+------------+ > | Category | LOCAL_PREF | > +-------------------------+------------+ > |Customer Routes | 100 | > |Customer backup Routes | 90 | > |Other ISP Routes | 80 | > |Customer-Provided backup | 70 | > +-------------------------+------------+ > > Table 1: Defined LOCAL_PREF Values > > > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> > wrote: > > In the real world, you would start with about 3 prepends and add one > at a > > time until you get the desired result. Once you get what you need, > you would > > maybe add another for good measure. This method has been proven to be > quite > > successful for me over the last 12 years in the Service Provider > > Environment. Just my experience and 2 cents worth. :-) > > -- > > Paul Negron > > CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752 > > Senior Technical Instructor > > www.micronicstraining.com > > > > > > > >> From: Fake Name <fname84_at_gmail.com> > >> Reply-To: Fake Name <fname84_at_gmail.com> > >> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:53:22 -0400 > >> To: Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> > >> Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > >> Subject: Re: bgp 2 isp question > >> > >> Tyson > >> > >> Thanks for the response. Let me ask you in the real world how many > times > >> would you prepend your as onto it to make it less perfered? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Yes that will work or you can use path prepending to make the AS- > PATH > >>> shorter for the one you want. Both are typical scenario's used on > the > >>> internet. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP > >>> Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > >>> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On > Behalf Of > >>> Fake > >>> Name > >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:06 PM > >>> To: Cisco certification > >>> Subject: bgp 2 isp question > >>> > >>> If i have a /23 block and I have two isps and 2 different routers. > I want > >>> to perfer traffic to come into 1 router for the block opposed to > the other. > >>> From what I understand /24 is the highest mask that wont be > summarized. > >>> > >>> All traffic should come into router1 untill it is down then traffic > will > >>> come into router 2 because they have more specific routes correct? > >>> > >>> > >>> Router1 most perfered > >>> ip route x.x.x.x x.x.x.x (next hop) 0 > >>> ip route x.x.x.x x.x.x.x (next hop) 0 > >>> router bgp x > >>> network x.x.xx.x 255.255.255.0 > >>> network x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 > >>> > >>> Router2 less perfered > >>> ip route x.x.x.x 255.255.254.0 (next hop) 0 > >>> router bgp x > >>> network x.x.x.x 255.255.254.0 > >>> > >>> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________________________________ > >>> Subscription information may be found at: > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > >> > >> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >> > >> > _______________________________________________________________________ > >> Subscription information may be found at: > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Sep 01 2010 - 09:56:20 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART