Re: "reboot required" on routers?

From: --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:58:28 -0500

Thanks George. My thinking as well. I know that if you dig thru the
archives, there's references to folks bouncing routers for various
reasons involving older technologies but I haven't heard of or seen
anything lately that would cause concern on the router side.

--Hammer--

On 8/16/2010 10:17 AM, George Goglidze wrote:
> I reloaded all devices just before I went to have my lunch... just in
> case...
>
> You might mess up things with ospf router-id, if you didn't clear the
> process after you changed it.
> But again, it's not a must, it's just a good practice.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM, --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:bhmccie_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All,
> Regarding the lab, I can think of two items that warrant
> reloading the 3560s.
>
> 1. If you change the system MTU to anything.
> 2. If you change the Switch Database Management (SDM prefer
> routing/vlan)
>
> I can't think of anything on the routers these days that would
> force a router reload. There was some question on a GNS thread
> about dynamic FR mappings but I've always been able to clear those
> out by shutting the interface and changing the encapsulation. I
> haven't experienced anything on my labs that has cornered me where
> I had to reload. The exception being the infamous "reload before
> lunch" speech we often hear on the forums.
>
> Am I missing anything? Anyone?
>
> --
>
>
> --Hammer--
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 16 2010 - 10:58:28 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART