Re: ROUTE MAP DOUBTS!!!

Well, at least I've yet to find out how the question means "the technology
doesn't work correctly". The answer hits the nail on the head but sometimes
a nice answer could be easily spoiled by an inappropriate introduction.

Kambiz Agahian

CCIE Instructor/Consultant
M.Eng Telecom, CCIE# 25341, CCSI# 33326, MCSE, MCSA

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Grammer, Christopher <
cgrammer_at_essilorusa.com> wrote:

> I guess I dont understand the reason for you being a jerk.
> Can you explain that please?
>
> Maybe if i type "Joseph L Brunner & Jerk" into google I will get a hit?
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
> <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:
>
> > "Doubts" is a rude way to ask a question... drop it, you'll sound much
> more
> > professional and serious if you simply ask your question. Just because
> you
> > don't know something doesn't mean the technology doesn't work correctly.
> >
> > I also doubt you know how to use google...
> >
> > From -
> >
> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk364/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801f3b54.shtml#caseone
> >
> > This document provides a sample configuration for policy-based routing
> > (PBR) using the set ip default next-hop and set ip next-hop commands.
> >
> > The set ip default next-hop command verifies the existence of the
> > destination IP address in the routing table, and...
> >
> > *
> >
> > if the destination IP address exists, the command does not policy
> > route the packet, but forwards the packet based on the routing table.
> > *
> >
> > if the destination IP address does not exist, the command policy
> > routes the packet by sending it to the specified next hop.
> >
> > The set ip next-hop command verifies the existence of the next hop
> > specified, and...
> >
> > *
> >
> > if the next hop exists in the routing table, then the command policy
> > routes the packet to the next hop.
> > *
> >
> > if the next hop does not exist in the routing table, the command
> uses
> > the normal routing table to forward the packet.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > HEMANTH RAJ
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:41 PM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: ROUTE MAP DOUBTS!!!
> >
> > Hey i was struck in with a doubt in route maps while doin labs
> > Can anyone tell me the difference between
> >
> > *set ip next hop* and *set ip default next hop*
> >
> > Got confused with these two commands
> >
> > --
> > Problems arise Bcoz we talk,prblms r not solve bcoz we dont talk So gud r
> > bad talk to ur affectionate one's freely
> >
> > Urs Friendly,
> > HP HEMANTH RAJ
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 18:18:33 ART