Re: OSPF router-id and net 0.0.0.0 in the LAB

Hello,

I wouldn't advise doing this. I would advise sticking to all the interfaces
that are known up to this moment of the lab and putting them in area 0, as
the case might arise that he will later tell you to create a loopback for
instance, and this will automatically be advertised into OSPF which might
not be what is intended.

HTH

KJ

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com>wrote:

> Q1 - When you are about to make a configuration they did not explicitly ask
> you for, I recommend that you ask yourself two questions:
> a. Will this configuration potentially help me gain points in this lab?
> b. Will this configuration potentially cost me any points in this lab?
>
> If you answer YES and NO respectively - you should most likely go for your
> extra config!
>
> Q2 - If they say to Configure R1 in OSPF area 0 and there is no diagram or
> any other guidance - your quick trick will be swell.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Jack Router
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 4:58 PM
> To: 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: OSPF router-id and net 0.0.0.0 in the LAB
>
> Hello,
>
> In the LAB:
> Is it safe to assign OSPF router id on a router even if not instructed ?
> Also, if task just says "configure R1 in OSPF area 0", is it safe to type
> "net 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 are 0"
> Did you or will you use those commands ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
KJ
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net