Re: 6509 and VSS ??

I meant X6148A.My mistake....
Still, it isn't supported in VSS.

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Brian Landers <brian_at_bluecoat93.org> wrote:
> 6148A is much better original than the old 6148. Still only 1 ASIC
> per 8-ports, but you get jumbo frames and 5.5mb buffer per port. I
> wouldn't put them in the data center, but they work well for POE
> access ports in the wiring closet.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:
>> It's 8, but yeah... still really bad. Then again, the all 4500, non-E chassis's have the same issue.
>>
>> -ryan
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>>> Behalf Of istong
>>> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 8:23 PM
>>> To: 'Ivan Hrvatska'
>>> Cc: 'Cisco certification'
>>> Subject: RE: 6509 and VSS ??
>>>
>>> Why would you want to use old crap like a WS-X6148 :) 12 ports share one
>>> 1GB capable asic. That's a bit too much oversubscription for my taste...
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian
>>> www.CCIE4u.com
>>> discounted rack rentals and lab scenarios
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>>> Behalf Of Ivan
>>> Hrvatska
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:55 AM
>>> To: istong_at_stong.org
>>> Cc: Cisco certification
>>> Subject: Re: 6509 and VSS ??
>>>
>>> With new IOS 122-33.SXI4a you can use both sups in each chassis and it
>>> works. But VSS has one big disadvantage. It doesn't support
>>> WS-X6148-GE-TX, only 67xx modules. What a crap.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:09 AM, <istong_at_stong.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Ivan,
>>> >
>>> > For now you are correct the 6500's only support one sup ver
>>> > chassis for VSS. I've heard from reliable sources that it
>>> > won't be too long before dual sup's per chassis is
>>> > supported.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ian
>>> > www.CCIE4u.com
>>> > discounted lab scenarios and rack rentals
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>> >> > [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ivan
>>> >> > Hrvatska Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:33 AM To: Cisco
>>> >> > certification Subject: Re: 6509 and VSS ??
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Well, since no one gave an answer, I have to answer
>>> >> > myself. At the moment only two supervisors can be put in
>>> >> VSL. >
>>> >> > Thanks
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ivan Hrvatska
>>> >> <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello experts,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> if you could be so nice and help me with next dilemma:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I have two 6509 and each of them has 2 supervisors
>>> >> VS-S720-10G-3C, so >> that is four supervisors. I'm
>>> >> planning to deploy VSS. In Cisco >> documentation VSS is
>>> >> explained through connection between supervisors >> (one
>>> >> in each chassis) via 10G interfaces which have been put
>>> >> into >> port-channel. Additionally, you can add 10G
>>> >> interfaces from >> WS-X6716-10G-3CXL modules into
>>> >> port-channel that is forming VSL >> between chassis.
>>> >> >> Since I have 2 SUPS, my question is can I connect two
>>> >> chassis like this: >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> C6509-1
>>> >> C6509-2 >> SUP-1-10G
>>> >> -------------------------------------- SUP-1-10G >>
>>> >> SUP-2-10G -------------------------------------- SUP-2-10G
>>> >> >> >> and form one VSL link and one VSS domain?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>> >> > _____________ Subscription information may be found at:
>>> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > This transmission contains information for the exclusive
>>> >> use of the intended recipient and may be privileged,
>>> >> confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure.
>>> >> Any unauthorized review or distribution is strictly
>>> >> prohibited. Our company is required to retain electronic
>>> >> mail messages, which may be produced at the request of
>>> >> regulators or in connection with litigation. Electronic
>>> >> messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or
>>> >> error-free. As such, we recommend that you do not send
>>> >> confidential information to us via electronic mail. This
>>> >> communication is for informational purposes only and is
>>> >> not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investment
>>> >> product. Any information regarding specific investment
>>> >> products is subject to change without notice. If you
>>> >> received this transmission in error, please notify the
>>> >> sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this
>>> >> message and any attachments from your system.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>> >> _____________ Subscription information may be found at:
>>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Bigger. Stronger. Faster.
>>> > Sign up for a New Free Email Account at http://MyEmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>> _____________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>> _____________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Brian C Landers
> http://www.packetslave.com/
> CCIE #23115

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 20:49:24 ART