Re: 6509 and VSS ??

6148A is much better original than the old 6148. Still only 1 ASIC
per 8-ports, but you get jumbo frames and 5.5mb buffer per port. I
wouldn't put them in the data center, but they work well for POE
access ports in the wiring closet.

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:
> It's 8, but yeah... still really bad. Then again, the all 4500, non-E chassis's have the same issue.
>
> -ryan
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>> Behalf Of istong
>> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 8:23 PM
>> To: 'Ivan Hrvatska'
>> Cc: 'Cisco certification'
>> Subject: RE: 6509 and VSS ??
>>
>> Why would you want to use old crap like a WS-X6148 :) 12 ports share one
>> 1GB capable asic. That's a bit too much oversubscription for my taste...
>>
>>
>> Ian
>> www.CCIE4u.com
>> discounted rack rentals and lab scenarios
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>> Behalf Of Ivan
>> Hrvatska
>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:55 AM
>> To: istong_at_stong.org
>> Cc: Cisco certification
>> Subject: Re: 6509 and VSS ??
>>
>> With new IOS 122-33.SXI4a you can use both sups in each chassis and it
>> works. But VSS has one big disadvantage. It doesn't support
>> WS-X6148-GE-TX, only 67xx modules. What a crap.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:09 AM, <istong_at_stong.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Ivan,
>> >
>> > For now you are correct the 6500's only support one sup ver
>> > chassis for VSS. I've heard from reliable sources that it
>> > won't be too long before dual sup's per chassis is
>> > supported.
>> >
>> >
>> > Ian
>> > www.CCIE4u.com
>> > discounted lab scenarios and rack rentals
>> >
>> >
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> > [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ivan
>> >> > Hrvatska Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:33 AM To: Cisco
>> >> > certification Subject: Re: 6509 and VSS ??
>> >> >
>> >> > Well, since no one gave an answer, I have to answer
>> >> > myself. At the moment only two supervisors can be put in
>> >> VSL. >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ivan Hrvatska
>> >> <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello experts,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if you could be so nice and help me with next dilemma:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have two 6509 and each of them has 2 supervisors
>> >> VS-S720-10G-3C, so >> that is four supervisors. I'm
>> >> planning to deploy VSS. In Cisco >> documentation VSS is
>> >> explained through connection between supervisors >> (one
>> >> in each chassis) via 10G interfaces which have been put
>> >> into >> port-channel. Additionally, you can add 10G
>> >> interfaces from >> WS-X6716-10G-3CXL modules into
>> >> port-channel that is forming VSL >> between chassis.
>> >> >> Since I have 2 SUPS, my question is can I connect two
>> >> chassis like this: >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> C6509-1
>> >> C6509-2 >> SUP-1-10G
>> >> -------------------------------------- SUP-1-10G >>
>> >> SUP-2-10G -------------------------------------- SUP-2-10G
>> >> >> >> and form one VSL link and one VSS domain?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> >> > _____________ Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > This transmission contains information for the exclusive
>> >> use of the intended recipient and may be privileged,
>> >> confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure.
>> >> Any unauthorized review or distribution is strictly
>> >> prohibited. Our company is required to retain electronic
>> >> mail messages, which may be produced at the request of
>> >> regulators or in connection with litigation. Electronic
>> >> messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or
>> >> error-free. As such, we recommend that you do not send
>> >> confidential information to us via electronic mail. This
>> >> communication is for informational purposes only and is
>> >> not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investment
>> >> product. Any information regarding specific investment
>> >> products is subject to change without notice. If you
>> >> received this transmission in error, please notify the
>> >> sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this
>> >> message and any attachments from your system.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> >> _____________ Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Bigger. Stronger. Faster.
>> > Sign up for a New Free Email Account at http://MyEmail.com
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> _____________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> _____________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Brian C Landers
http://www.packetslave.com/
CCIE #23115
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net