Re: Scaling factor ... 2560

thanks carlos :)

On 4 August 2010 16:41, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:

> Obviously from a cisco track development engineer who does not work with
> OSPF :)
>
> Thing is, track is protocol independent and different protocols use
> different metrics. They decided that 1 byte was enough precision to
> track a route, so they try to fit different protocol metrics into
> the 0-255 range.
>
> Some documents state that the RIP factor is "times 17" instead of
> 1. Luckily, OSPF (and EIGRP/ISIS/BGP/static) support changing the
> default with "track resolution ip route ospf xxxx".
>
> -Carlos
>
> Taufik Kurniawan @ 3/08/2010 2:17 -0300 dixit:
> > here :
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/E-Learning/bulk/public/cln/qlm/ccnp/QLM-VRRP/Configuring_VRRP_to_Track_an_Interface.htm
> >
> > it mentions scaling factor :
> >
> > eigrp 2560
> > is-is , static : 10
> > ospf, rip : 1
> >
> > where this number come from ?
> >
> > anyone care to explain ?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 04 2010 - 19:09:36 ART