yes i took of the VRF from my loopback interface and see that it will
inherit the vrf PPPOE when the Virtual-template interface is put into the
vrf PPPOE and the ospf comes back up:
R6#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R6(config)#interface Loopback67
R6(config-if)#no ip vrf forwarding PPPOE
% Interface Loopback67 IP address 67.6.7.6 removed due to disabling VRF
PPPOE
R6(config-if)#
*Mar 1 00:25:59.615: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1000, Nbr 1.1.1.1 on
Virtual-Access1.1 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or
detached
R6(config-if)# ip address 67.6.7.6 255.255.255.0
R6(config-if)#
*Mar 1 00:26:08.907: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1000, Nbr 1.1.1.1 on
Virtual-Access1.1 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
good stuff, thanks for the scenario...
-- Garry L. Baker "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Prakash Kalsaria < kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote: > I have done Ip unnumbered of F0/1 > and applied ip on F0/1 rather than any loopback > so i have to apply vrf on templeate and F0/1 > > > > and if i do so, i get the OSPF neighbor Ship > but, when i apply VRF only on physical, i also get the OSPF neighborship > so is it neccesary to apply on Virtual-templeate > > - Show quoted text - > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:55 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>wrote: > >> well my curiostiy got the best of me, i got it to work with the ip >> unnumbered interface my loop67 in my vrf PPPOE and also on the >> virtual-template interface: >> >> hostname R6 >> ! >> ip vrf PPPOE >> rd 1:1 >> ! >> bba-group pppoe global >> virtual-template 1 >> ! >> interface Loopback67 >> ip vrf forwarding PPPOE >> ip address 67.6.7.6 255.255.255.0 >> ! >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> no ip address >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> pppoe enable group global >> ! >> interface Virtual-Template1 >> ip vrf forwarding PPPOE >> ip unnumbered Loopback67 >> ip ospf mtu-ignore >> peer default ip address pool R7 >> ! >> router ospf 1000 vrf PPPOE >> log-adjacency-changes >> network 67.6.7.6 0.0.0.0 area 0 >> ! >> ip local pool R7 67.6.7.7 >> >> >> >> hostname R1 >> ! >> interface Loopback1 >> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 >> ip ospf 1000 area 0 >> ! >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> no ip address >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> pppoe enable group global >> pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 >> ! >> interface Dialer1 >> ip address negotiated >> encapsulation ppp >> ip ospf mtu-ignore >> ip ospf 1000 area 0 >> dialer pool 1 >> dialer-group 1 >> ! >> router ospf 1000 >> router-id 1.1.1.1 >> log-adjacency-changes >> >> >> R6#sh ip ospf interface brief >> Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C >> Vi1.1 1000 0 0.0.0.0/0 1 P2P 1/1 >> Vt1 1000 0 0.0.0.0/0 1 DOWN 0/0 >> Lo67 1000 0 67.6.7.6/24 1 LOOP 0/0 >> >> >> >> R6#sh ip route vrf PPPOE >> 1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets >> O 1.1.1.1 [110/2] via 67.6.7.7, 00:02:33, Virtual-Access1.1 >> 67.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks >> C 67.6.7.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback67 >> C 67.6.7.7/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1.1 >> >> >> >> R1#sh ip route >> 1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets >> C 1.1.1.1 is directly connected, Loopback1 >> 67.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets >> C 67.6.7.6 is directly connected, Dialer1 >> C 67.6.7.7 is directly connected, Dialer1 >> >> R1#sh ip ospf int br >> Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C >> Di1 1000 0 67.6.7.7/32 1785 P2P 1/1 >> Lo1 1000 0 1.1.1.1/32 1 LOOP 0/0 >> >> R6#ping vrf PPPOE 1.1.1.1 >> >> Type escape sequence to abort. >> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: >> !!!!! >> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/33/64 ms >> >> R6#traceroute vrf PPPOE 1.1.1.1 >> >> Type escape sequence to abort. >> Tracing the route to 1.1.1.1 >> >> 1 67.6.7.7 84 msec 68 msec * >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Garry L. Baker >> >> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> is the IP of the Unnumbered f0/1 in the VRF? >>> >>> you can manually set the ospf router-id to correct that if need be i >>> would imagine >>> >>> interesting combo of vrf with pppoe i will have to lab it up... >>> >>> you have a simple diagram of your setup or sh run from the client/server? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Garry L. Baker >>> >>> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Prakash Kalsaria < >>> kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> My Virtual templeate has an IP from Unnumbered fa0/1 >>>> >>>> but when i apply the vrf for on Virtual-template than i am able to form >>>> a >>>> adjacency >>>> even after i put mtu 1492 on dialer >>>> >>>> when i start the OSPF process >>>> it say cannot take a router-id for the OSPF proccess >>>> >>>> is it we have to apply it on both Virtual-templeate and physical >>>> Interface >>>> >>>> Thanks for the Reply >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com >>>> >wrote: >>>> >>>> > Prakash >>>> > >>>> > You are using a virtual-template therefore you would need to configure >>>> > your ip address on the virtual-template. >>>> > This tells me that you would need to configure the virtual -template >>>> > to forward the VRF otherwise the ip address >>>> > will not be routable in the VRF you require. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 31 July 2010 15:18, Prakash Kalsaria <kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > I have a router which is a server for the PPPoE session and is a PE >>>> for a >>>> > > VPN site >>>> > > now were do i apply a Vrf forwarding on physical interface / >>>> > > virtual-templeate >>>> > > or on Both >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> > > Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Jul 31 2010 - 18:34:49 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 19:19:15 ART