RE: Eigrp Metrics

From: Nathan Richie <nathanr_at_boice.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:37:48 -0400

Just be mindful of what else may be required. For instance, in one of my practice labs, I used all 1s for the K values. Later in the lab I was required to do some routing manipulation with the variance metric and by using all 1s, it really jacked what value I needed to use in the variance command. Looking at the solutions guide, it should similar values to what you listed and made the variance task much easier.

Hope this helps,

Nathan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mustafa Yadav
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 4:11 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Eigrp Metrics

hi,

In one of lab it is saying perfrom mutual redistribution between eigrp and
ospf .

For me under eigrp redistibute ospf 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1 is right answer.but
in lab answer quide it is written 1000 100 255 3 1500.

I know the question is a little bit weird.There must be a reason for using
these K values.But my question is wheter it is OK for us to use 1 1 1 1 1
or any other values if something is not defined explicitly in the question?

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 18 2010 - 16:37:48 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 09:11:37 ART