Re: "redistribute connected" question

I suppose the reason is "making sure". It's generally a good practice
to know exactly what happens in your network. If you add new network
later, unless you have a route-map, you will probably redistribute
that one, too. This may or may not be desired...

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 15:10, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am seeing in workbooks that when redistributing connected routes it is
> done with a route-map: "redistribute connected route-map XXX". Even if there
> is only one connected route and it must be redistributed. Simple
> "redistribute connected" will do. It will not affect other networks
> advertised specifically in the routing protocol. If a route is
> advertised/redistributed as both internal AND external, internal will take
> precedence.
>
> Is there any special reason for using route-map all the time ? I see no
> technical reasons.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net