I would tend to agree with Marko 100%. It is more of a formality and a precaution. Like he said, if you add an interface later (bring up a physical interface or add a tunnel for instance) it could be added into a routing process. You may or may not want that to happen. Typically in a lab environment like the CCIE, you could be given very specific instructions as far as what interfaces go into what IGP. If you get into the habit of using route-maps in practice you don't have to worry about unexpected surprises later on : )
HTH
Regards
Joe Astorino, CCIE #24347
"He not busy being born is busy dying" -- Dylan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
To: "Jack Router" <pan.router_at_gmail.com>
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 11:24:44 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: "redistribute connected" question
I suppose the reason is "making sure". It's generally a good practice
to know exactly what happens in your network. If you add new network
later, unless you have a route-map, you will probably redistribute
that one, too. This may or may not be desired...
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack time with our Blended Learning Solution! Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 15:10, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > I am seeing in workbooks that when redistributing connected routes it is > done with a route-map: "redistribute connected route-map XXX". Even if there > is only one connected route and it must be redistributed. Simple > "redistribute connected" will do. It will not affect other networks > advertised specifically in the routing protocol. If a route is > advertised/redistributed as both internal AND external, internal will take > precedence. > > Is there any special reason for using route-map all the time ? I see no > technical reasons. Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri May 28 2010 - 18:16:29 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:54 ART