Hi All -
this is a very very simple set up of eBgp peering via loopbacks and then
advertising the local loopbacks. The idea is to get the candidate to
realize the recursive routing issue and to use the backdoor command for the
network statements. The problem is, my routers are not advertising the
loopbacks? Any ideas?
R4 <--> R2
router bgp 400
no synchronization
bgp router-id 172.16.104.1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 172.16.104.0 mask 255.255.255.0 backdoor
neighbor 172.16.102.1 remote-as 200
neighbor 172.16.102.1 ebgp-multihop 255
neighbor 172.16.102.1 update-source Loopback104
no auto-summary
R4#s bgp sum
BGP router identifier 172.16.104.1, local AS number 400
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
172.16.102.1 4 200 38 38 1 0 0
00:36:35 0
R4#sho ip bgp - you notice NOTHING is in the table
R4#
R4#sho ip bgp neighbors 172.16.102.1 advertised-routes
Total number of prefixes *0 *
interface Loopback104
ip address 172.16.104.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-mode
ip igmp join-group 239.255.1.1
ip ospf network point-to-point
R4#show ip route 172.16.102.0
Routing entry for 172.16.102.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, forward metric
3
Redistributing via rip
Advertised by rip metric 15
Last update from 172.16.10.6 on FastEthernet0/1, 00:41:06 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 172.16.10.6, from 172.16.102.1, 00:41:06 ago, via FastEthernet0/1
Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
-- r/ LG Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon May 24 2010 - 09:07:33 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART