Re: Re : OSPF cost through MPLS VPN

From: Adrian Brayton <abrayton_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 07:08:09 -0400

When the Sham-Link is up and operational, the backdoor link should have a HIGHER cost not a lower cost.

On May 23, 2010, at 11:55 PM, <kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> <kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> if the backdoor link cost is same as the MPLS VPN backbone
> It Will choose intra-area routes even after manipulating the cost
>
> other option which i tried during labbing was change the cost of backdoor link
> on physical interface
>
> Using a Sham link: you backdoor link cost should be less than the MPLS VPN
> backbone to choose backbone for traffic
>
>
> Prakash Kalsaria
> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 07:08:09 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART