Re: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN

Idowu,

Either one should be fine for security purposes. GETVPN would be better if
you cannot handle the latency when the first packet is wasted on NHRP
processing everytime. I personally have not seen where this is a serious
issue...yet. That said, I am currently using DMVPN for a Multicast
application through an SP and it works great.

-- 
Paul Negron
CCSI#22752, CCIE# 14856 (SP)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
We offer R&S, SP, and Security CCIE Boot camps
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks available
On 5/22/10 12:59 AM, "just kennie" <justkennie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>  I want to run my secure traffic over MPLS cloud of SP, security is my
> priority, which should I go for???
> 
> Idowu Kehinde
> CCNA
> CCNP
> CCIP
> CCIE (written)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM, just kennie <justkennie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I want to run my secure traffic over MPLS cloud of SP, security is my
>> priority, which should I go for???
>> 
>> Idowu Kehinde
>> CCNA
>> CCNP
>> CCIP
>> CCIE (written)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> if you are not running critically secure documentation I am not sure of
>>> the
>>> reason for encryption but I think the design purpose of GetVPN is for
>>> exactly your situation.  If you have another device that can act as the
>>> key-server this may be the route to take.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>> 
>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>> 
>>> Mailto:  <mailto:tscott_at_ipexpert.com> tscott_at_ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: NeT [mailto:netmrt_at_gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:51 PM
>>> To: Tyson Scott
>>> Cc: Cisco certification
>>> Subject: Re: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> this private line which is layer 2 MPLS (QinQ) were all traffic must pass
>>> HO
>>> router.
>>> you can consider it hub and spoke connection.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You forgot the third; GetVPN over DMVPN.  Is this public or leased lines.
>>> will the provider accept traffic across it from any source any
>>> destination?
>>> Too little information... too many choices.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>> NeT
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:15 PM
>>> To: Cisco certification
>>> Subject: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> which one is better DMVPN or GETVPN. I have two links for each branch to
>>> HO
>>> and this link is layer 2 connectivity from 2 different ISP.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net