RE: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN

Go for GETVPN

Site-to-Site VPN Technologies Comparison

http://www-search.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6
635/ps7180/prod_brochure0900aecd80582078.pdf

-
Daniel #0x5d01 (RS)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Piotr Matusiak
Sent: Samstag, 22. Mai 2010 07:07
To: just kennie
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN

GETVPN

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6635/ps7
1
80/white_paper_c11-471053.html

HTH,

--
Piotr Matusiak
CCIE #19860 (R&S, Security)
Technical Instructor
website: www.MicronicsTraining.com
blog: www.ccie1.com
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough -
Albert Einstein
2010/5/22 just kennie <justkennie_at_gmail.com>
>  I want to run my secure traffic over MPLS cloud of SP, security is my
> priority, which should I go for???
>
> Idowu Kehinde
> CCNA
> CCNP
> CCIP
> CCIE (written)
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM, just kennie <justkennie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I want to run my secure traffic over MPLS cloud of SP, security is my
> > priority, which should I go for???
> >
> > Idowu Kehinde
> > CCNA
> > CCNP
> > CCIP
> > CCIE (written)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Well,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> if you are not running critically secure documentation I am not sure of
> >> the
> >> reason for encryption but I think the design purpose of GetVPN is for
> >> exactly your situation.  If you have another device that can act as the
> >> key-server this may be the route to take.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> >>
> >> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> >>
> >> Mailto:  <mailto:tscott_at_ipexpert.com> tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: NeT [mailto:netmrt_at_gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:51 PM
> >> To: Tyson Scott
> >> Cc: Cisco certification
> >> Subject: Re: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> this private line which is layer 2 MPLS (QinQ) were all traffic must
> pass
> >> HO
> >> router.
> >> you can consider it hub and spoke connection.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> You forgot the third; GetVPN over DMVPN.  Is this public or leased
> lines.
> >> will the provider accept traffic across it from any source any
> >> destination?
> >> Too little information... too many choices.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> >> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> >> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> NeT
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:15 PM
> >> To: Cisco certification
> >> Subject: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> which one is better DMVPN or GETVPN. I have two links for each branch
to
> >> HO
> >> and this link is layer 2 connectivity from 2 different ISP.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net