Re: OT: asr1xxx NAT with route-map vs vrf

> Question#1:
> Just wondering, will below case#1 and case2 do the same thing?
>
> Case#1
>
> ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.1 60.1.1.1 route-map RED
> route-map RED permit 10
> set vrf RED
>
>
> Vs
>
> Case#2
>
> ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.1 60.1.1.1 vrf RED
>
>
> Question#2
>
> ip nat source static 192.168.123.1 192.168.125.10 vrf service
>
>
> what does here services keyword do in the above line?

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 08 2010 - 13:48:06 ART