RE: R&S OEQ's are GONE!!

From: Travis Niedens <niedentj_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 09:49:40 -0700

I agree as well. If you're in the heat of the moment and troubleshooting you
should know at least what would be covered in OEQs. You're not likely to have
a manager standing over you saying "answer me these questions 4" while things
are broken. It does happen but usually if you get things fixed they prefer
that :)

Travis

> From: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 18:29:36 +0200
> Subject: Re: R&S OEQ's are GONE!!
> To: niedentj_at_hotmail.com
> CC: jeffpaz_at_gmail.com; bedgar2500_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 18:27, Travis Niedens <niedentj_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > "and yeh the Lord smot the OEQs and theB OEQs died a most brief death.
But
> > what lies ahead to fill in the gap?"
>
> Apparently, Troubleshooting section accomplishes the same thing. I
> tend to agree...
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 06 2010 - 09:49:40 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:52 ART