Well, using globally assigned address space in your network is a bad
idea. When you start with a bad idea that you need to implement, the
only way to make it work is CF.
This thread is about a bad idea :-). I offered the solution for a
problem that results from it. Don't shoot the messenger ... :-)
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack time with our Blended Learning Solution! Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:40, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote: > Marko, > >> -----Original Message----- >> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:32 PM >> To: dls152_at_cox.net; groupstudy >> Subject: Re: using public ip address on private networ >> >> > What happens if there is a host on internet with same addressing we use >> > internally? The host B destination address is being routed on lan what >> happens? >> > How does the users gain access to public host? >> >> Obviously, you can't access it directly. However, you can translate >> the name of the ouside hosts with overlapping addresses to something >> else. For example, you can map external hosts, 1:1, to some of the >> RFC1918 ranges and be done with it. >> > > That sounds like a CF :) B It's bad enough to deal with RFC1918 overlap, why try to translate allocated public space. > > -ryan Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Apr 26 2010 - 13:20:20 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART