Just curious how something like that can happen ? As far as I know even when
you are at Cisco the Lab is remote also. What is then the difference when
you sit at non Cisco site ?
BTW, I access my home lab from anywhere in the world with no issues :)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Anthony Sequeira
Sent: 19-Apr-10 11:52
To: Charles.Henson_at_regions.com
Cc: Steve Rossen; Cisco certification; nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Pearson Lab Review
Unfortunately, I had one of my students attempt a Pearson center for their
exam about two weeks ago now.
It was a disaster. Not "little bumps" as someone pointed out here. It was a
pure disaster.
There was no access to any of the promised tools; DOC-CD, notepad,
calculator, but the worst part was the fact that the four switches were not
accessible. There was a flaw in the Graphical User Interface for their
access.
While it was a shame to see Cisco beta test this on live candidates, it was
nice to see them refund his money, extend his written expiration, and
provide him with a free voucher for a retake. Perhaps the most stressful
thing about it for him during the entire experience, was hearing the
resident non-CCIE proctor repeat over and over again "it is by design"
whenever he pointed out these fatal flaws. :-( The fact that he did not
completely lose his cool is a testament to his strong psychology for
passing.
Warmest Regards,
Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
http://www.INE.com
Test your Core Knowledge today!
Q: What is used to define redundant and load-balanced RPs for multicast?
A: anycast
More Info:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers
/anycast.html
On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Charles.Henson_at_regions.com wrote:
> Steve,
> Did you ever respond with an update? Some of us are very curious
> about your case you opened and getting your full (NON NDA VIOLATING)
> feedback. What's the rest of the story? Something good I hope. Silver
> lining maybe?
>
> Charles Henson
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Steve Rossen <steve.rossen_at_gmail.com>
>
> To: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>
> Date: 04/08/2010 05:17 PM
>
> Subject: Pearson Lab Review
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Its horrible. I expect everyone at my center to get a free retake, not
> sure about others. One guy left half way through because of so many
> issues. Be glad you did not sign up for it. I am going to hold back
> until I hear back about the case I opened. The test engine was slow
> and kept crashing. I had a 20" monitor but a resolution that looked
> 1024x768 (stretched because it was wide screen) so you could not view
> what you wanted to. Also tools/resources you are used to accessing you
> did not have access to. (That one is HUGE!!!!) I want to say more but
> not sure whats covered but the NDA. I already have opened a case, will
> update you after I hear more.
>
>
> The good:
>
> Security, that place is security, its nothing like VUE. Its also far
> more secure then RTP. They even looked in my pockets. You could not
> leave for lunch during the config section as it looked at first.
>
> OEQ's are a non-issue. I don't want to say more here then if your
> prepared don't worry it. I mean it, if your ready your going to be
> 100% fine. No reason to get a waiver now. The promo to 360 students is
> now worthless.
>
>
> Did I pass? No result yet but I was very very close so I might get a
> number soon. If I had access to all the promised tools I still would
> have passed even with all those issues.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 19 2010 - 12:14:20 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART