Actually I wanted to test you guyz.... Good going :-)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:51 PM, S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we are mixing AND|OR options of route-maps with class-map which
> itself has the option of match-all or match-any.
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> AND
>>
>> Class-map test
>> Match ip precedence 4
>> Match access-group 199
>>
>>
>>
>> OR
>>
>> Class-map match-any test
>> Match ip precedence 4
>> Match access-group 199
>>
>>
>> OR
>>
>> Class-map match-any test
>> Match dscp 41
>> Match dscp 31
>>
>>
>>
>> OR
>>
>> Class-map Match-any test
>> Match dscp 31
>> Match dscp 41
>>
>>
>> It seems to be not correct
>> Class-map test
>> Match dscp 41
>> Match dscp 31
>>
>> Thanks
>> Shahid
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Same line = OR. Multiple lines = AND.
>>> BUT it is AND when two or more matching statements are refering different
>>> object types e.g match ip add & match interface etc.
>>>
>>> If the object type used in match statement is same then it should be OR
>>> e.g match ip add 1, match ip add 2 etc.
>>> Please verify.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> It might be hidden command ;) Lolz
>>>>
>>>> Muhammad , When I read your email I shocked and I turned my face from
>>>> monitor and just started to think ..................LOLz
>>>>
>>>> That was good one !
>>>>
>>>> " Khan sahaab aisa mat kariyo" :P
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sh_at_hid
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Shaughn Smith <shaughn.s_at_cvnnet.co.za
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Lol, I was just about to post that
>>>> >
>>>> > #route-map TEST ?
>>>> > <0-65535> Sequence to insert to/delete from existing route-map entry
>>>> > deny Route map denies set operations
>>>> > permit Route map permits set operations
>>>> > <cr>
>>>> >
>>>> > Route-map cannot be used with a match-all/any statement
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > CCIE # 23962
>>>> >
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>>> Of
>>>> > Muhammad Anser Khan
>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:00 PM
>>>> > To: cristian.matei_at_datanets.ro
>>>> > Cc: Vijay Yadav; Cisco certification
>>>> > Subject: Re: Route-Map with Multiple Match entry
>>>> >
>>>> > oh yes :-) lolz
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Cristian Matei
>>>> > <cristian.matei_at_datanets.ro>wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi Anser,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Do not confuse class-maps with route-maps :)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Cristian.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>>>> Behalf
>>>> > Of
>>>> > > Muhammad Anser Khan
>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:46 PM
>>>> > > To: Vijay Yadav
>>>> > > Cc: Cisco certification
>>>> > > Subject: Re: Route-Map with Multiple Match entry
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Dear Vijay,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > It depends how you configure the route-maps. By default route-map is
>>>> > work
>>>> > > on
>>>> > > "MATCH-ALL" in which Route-map requires all the statement should be
>>>> > TRUE to
>>>> > > proceed.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > If you configure Route-map as "MATCH-ANY" then route-map start with
>>>> > the
>>>> > > first available match and so on. If Route-map finds any of them
>>>> TRUE,
>>>> > it
>>>> > > will proceed without matching rest of them.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Anser
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > If multiple match statements are used within a one route map
>>>> > instance,all
>>>> > > > match statements must match for the route map instance for a true
>>>> > > result.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thanks
>>>> > > > Shahid Ansari
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Vijay Yadav <vijay_at_vijayyadav.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > Hi All,
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > A small query regarding the Route-Map, Let say if we have
>>>> multiple
>>>> > > > > Match entry under the same route-map sequence number then how
>>>> > these
>>>> > > > > entry should be treated like OR & END operation.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > For Eg:
>>>> > > > > route-map rm-export permit 10
>>>> > > > > match community <community-list_name>
>>>> > > > > match ip address acl-rt-<service_name>
>>>> > > > > !
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 06 2010 - 22:55:10 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:56 ART