I think we are mixing AND|OR options of route-maps with class-map which
itself has the option of match-all or match-any.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> AND
>
> Class-map test
> Match ip precedence 4
> Match access-group 199
>
>
>
> OR
>
> Class-map match-any test
> Match ip precedence 4
> Match access-group 199
>
>
> OR
>
> Class-map match-any test
> Match dscp 41
> Match dscp 31
>
>
>
> OR
>
> Class-map Match-any test
> Match dscp 31
> Match dscp 41
>
>
> It seems to be not correct
> Class-map test
> Match dscp 41
> Match dscp 31
>
> Thanks
> Shahid
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Same line = OR. Multiple lines = AND.
>> BUT it is AND when two or more matching statements are refering different
>> object types e.g match ip add & match interface etc.
>>
>> If the object type used in match statement is same then it should be OR
>> e.g match ip add 1, match ip add 2 etc.
>> Please verify.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> It might be hidden command ;) Lolz
>>>
>>> Muhammad , When I read your email I shocked and I turned my face from
>>> monitor and just started to think ..................LOLz
>>>
>>> That was good one !
>>>
>>> " Khan sahaab aisa mat kariyo" :P
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sh_at_hid
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Shaughn Smith <shaughn.s_at_cvnnet.co.za
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Lol, I was just about to post that
>>> >
>>> > #route-map TEST ?
>>> > <0-65535> Sequence to insert to/delete from existing route-map entry
>>> > deny Route map denies set operations
>>> > permit Route map permits set operations
>>> > <cr>
>>> >
>>> > Route-map cannot be used with a match-all/any statement
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > CCIE # 23962
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>> Of
>>> > Muhammad Anser Khan
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:00 PM
>>> > To: cristian.matei_at_datanets.ro
>>> > Cc: Vijay Yadav; Cisco certification
>>> > Subject: Re: Route-Map with Multiple Match entry
>>> >
>>> > oh yes :-) lolz
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Cristian Matei
>>> > <cristian.matei_at_datanets.ro>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Anser,
>>> > >
>>> > > Do not confuse class-maps with route-maps :)
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Cristian.
>>> > >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>> > Of
>>> > > Muhammad Anser Khan
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:46 PM
>>> > > To: Vijay Yadav
>>> > > Cc: Cisco certification
>>> > > Subject: Re: Route-Map with Multiple Match entry
>>> > >
>>> > > Dear Vijay,
>>> > >
>>> > > It depends how you configure the route-maps. By default route-map is
>>> > work
>>> > > on
>>> > > "MATCH-ALL" in which Route-map requires all the statement should be
>>> > TRUE to
>>> > > proceed.
>>> > >
>>> > > If you configure Route-map as "MATCH-ANY" then route-map start with
>>> > the
>>> > > first available match and so on. If Route-map finds any of them TRUE,
>>> > it
>>> > > will proceed without matching rest of them.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Anser
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > If multiple match statements are used within a one route map
>>> > instance,all
>>> > > > match statements must match for the route map instance for a true
>>> > > result.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks
>>> > > > Shahid Ansari
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Vijay Yadav <vijay_at_vijayyadav.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hi All,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > A small query regarding the Route-Map, Let say if we have
>>> multiple
>>> > > > > Match entry under the same route-map sequence number then how
>>> > these
>>> > > > > entry should be treated like OR & END operation.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > For Eg:
>>> > > > > route-map rm-export permit 10
>>> > > > > match community <community-list_name>
>>> > > > > match ip address acl-rt-<service_name>
>>> > > > > !
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 06 2010 - 15:51:37 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:56 ART