Re: SUMMARIZATION FOR PATH MANUPULATION

From: Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:39:28 -0600

Bernard,

This is a good proctor question and depends on the scenario. Keep it simple,
if you need to summarize, I am sure it will be apparent to you. The bottom
line is that you understand it as on option and that's the important thing.

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Bernard Steven <buny.steven_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Group,
>
> This question is regarding traffic engineering.
>
> Let us assume that we could do traffic engineering by summarization in OSPF
> or EIGRP , but this block the specific prefixes from being advertised.
>
> In the CCIE lab , if another task does not require the specific routes ,
> can
> we use summarization for traffic engineering , or they want the routes to
> be
> visible everywhere unless they asked specifically to summarize ?
>
> Simply , can we do route summarization for path manipulation in the LAB
> even it is not specifically stated ?
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 02 2010 - 11:39:28 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:56 ART