Re: Tag BGP external routes?

Yes, it should.
It works on router 12.4(T). I cannot test on 3560 12.2

-mirco.

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> OK. So we came to conclusion that set tag under route-map should work,
> right?
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mirco Orlandi <mirco.orlandi_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > ok Ivan. Same config, different result.
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map set-tag
> >
> > SW2#sh route-map set-tag
> > route-map set-tag, permit, sequence 10
> > Match clauses:
> > tag 254
> > Set clauses:
> > tag 999
> > Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
> > route-map set-tag, permit, sequence 100
> > Match clauses:
> > Set clauses:
> > Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
> > SW2#
> > SW2#sh ip eigrp topology | include 10.0.0.5
> > P 10.0.0.5/32, 1 successors, FD is 1275392, tag is 254
> > SW2#
> > SW2#sh ip ospf database | include 10.0.0.5
> > 10.0.0.5 10.0.0.1 202 0x80000002 0x005248 999
> >
> > -mirco.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> BB3 instead of BB1
> >>
> >> SW2(OSPF, EIGRP 100) ----------------- BB3(EIGRP 100, BGP
> >> 253)-------------BB2(BGP 254)
> >>
> >>
> >> BB3:
> >> !
> >> router eigrp 100
> >> redistribute bgp 253 metric 1 1 1 1 1
> >> network 9.9.33.0 0.0.0.255
> >> network 198.3.0.0 0.0.255.255
> >> no auto-summary
> >> !
> >> router bgp 253
> >> no synchronization
> >> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> >> neighbor 1.1.23.2 remote-as 254
> >> no auto-summary
> >> !
> >>
> >> SW2:
> >> !
> >> router eigrp 100
> >> network 9.9.33.0 0.0.0.255
> >> no auto-summary
> >> !
> >> router ospf 1
> >> log-adjacency-changes
> >> summary-address 198.3.0.0 255.255.248.0
> >> redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map TAG
> >> network 9.9.8.8 0.0.0.0 area 1
> >> network 9.9.234.8 0.0.0.0 area 1
> >> network 9.9.243.8 0.0.0.0 area 1
> >> !
> >> ip classless
> >> no ip http server
> >> no ip http secure-server
> >> !
> >> !
> >> !
> >> route-map TAG permit 10
> >> match tag 254
> >> set tag 999
> >> !
> >> route-map TAG permit 90
> >> !
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Mirco Orlandi <
> mirco.orlandi_at_gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Could be, but it is better to make one last check. Can you post also:
> >> > - eigrp topology
> >> > - ospf and eigrp config sections
> >> > - route-map
> >> >
> >> > -m.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hmm...This is my OSPF database output:
> >> >>
> >> >> Type-5 AS External Link States
> >> >>
> >> >> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag
> >> >> 9.9.33.0 9.9.8.8 4 0x80000001 0x0097B3 0
> >> >> 99.99.1.0 9.9.8.8 5 0x80000001 0x0014A3 254
> >> >> 99.99.2.0 9.9.8.8 5 0x80000001 0x0009AD 254
> >> >> 99.99.3.0 9.9.8.8 5 0x80000001 0x00FDB7 254
> >> >> 99.99.4.0 9.9.8.8 5 0x80000001 0x00F2C1 254
> >> >> 99.99.5.0 9.9.8.8 5 0x80000001 0x00E7CB 254
> >> >> 198.3.0.0 9.9.8.8 5 0x80000001 0x008635 0
> >> >>
> >> >> This is an output on another SW in OSPF domain.
> >> >> Software in SW2 is:
> >> >> c3750-advipservicesk9-mz.122-35.SE5
> >> >>
> >> >> Could be a bug?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mirco Orlandi
> >> >> <mirco.orlandi_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > ok Ivan,
> >> >> > AS253 is what I supposed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > SW2(ospf1+eigrpAS100)--BB1(eigrpAS100+bgpAS253)--BB2(bgpAS254)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > BB1 redistribute bgpAS253 into eigrpAS100. All bgp routes that BB1
> >> >> > learn
> >> >> > from BB2 will be tagged 254 during redistribution (Ryan point). Tag
> >> >> > swap
> >> >> > 254->999 work fine in my lab with route-map I posted (I see tag 999
> >> >> > in
> >> >> > "show
> >> >> > ip ospf database").
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cisco IOS Software, 2600 Software (C2691-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M),
> Version
> >> >> > 12.4(15)T8
> >> >> > -mirco.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com
> >
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> SW2----------BB1(AS253)-----------BB2 (AS254)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> SW2 -device I have to configure the task on
> >> >> >> BB1 - my EIGRP neighbor and BGP router in AS253
> >> >> >> BB2 - eBGP peer with BB1
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, to simulate the task BB2 is in AS253 and has eBGP session with
> >> >> >> BB1
> >> >> >> so that BB1 can redistribute prefixes into EIGRP which are
> received
> >> >> >> via eBGP session, right?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Next, when BB1 redistributes those prefixes into EIGRP my SW2
> >> >> >> receives
> >> >> >> them with route tag 254, which is AS number of originator of those
> >> >> >> prefixes, right?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, now I should match any tag other than 253 cause I know that my
> >> >> >> EIGRP neighbor is in AS 253 and it has to receive prefixes from
> >> >> >> another AS for that prefixes to be external, right?
> >> >> >> When I issue show ip route 99.99.1.0 and see that route tag is
> 254,
> >> >> >> I
> >> >> >> match that tag. But, set tag in the same route map statement
> doesn't
> >> >> >> work. It won't change tag. In OSPF domain I still see those
> prefixes
> >> >> >> with original tag 254.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> When I issue set tag command under redistribution eigrp command
> >> >> >> (when
> >> >> >> I redistribute from EIGRP into OSPF), tag is changed, but it is
> >> >> >> changed for ALL redistributed EIGRP routes, and that is on the
> goal.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Mirco Orlandi
> >> >> >> <mirco.orlandi_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Ivan, by your show on SW2 I see you are using "tag 200" inside
> >> >> >> > redistribution statement.
> >> >> >> > Result should be:
> >> >> >> > - change tag to 999 for routes with tag 254
> >> >> >> > - set tag 200 to others
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > It works fine on my lab.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > What do you mean by "I know that my EIGRP neighbor is in AS
> 253"?
> >> >> >> > You have ospf 1, eigrp AS100, and a remote bgp peer with AS254.
> Is
> >> >> >> > AS253
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > local BGP AS of SW2 eigrp neighbor?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > -mirco.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ivan Hrvatska
> >> >> >> > <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Well, let's say that my EIGRP neighbor, which is also BGP
> router,
> >> >> >> >> recives some prefixes via eBGP session and redistribute them
> into
> >> >> >> >> EIGRP. My router (SW2) recives that prefixes via EIGRP and
> EIGRP
> >> >> >> >> has
> >> >> >> >> originator's AS number as route tag:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> SW2#sh ip ro 99.99.1.0
> >> >> >> >> Routing entry for 99.99.1.0/24
> >> >> >> >> Known via "eigrp 100", distance 170, metric 2560000512
> >> >> >> >> Tag 254, type external
> >> >> >> >> Redistributing via ospf 1, eigrp 100
> >> >> >> >> Advertised by ospf 1 subnets tag 200 route-map TAG
> >> >> >> >> Last update from 9.9.33.254 on Vlan33, 00:04:02 ago
> >> >> >> >> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >> >> >> >> * 9.9.33.254, from 9.9.33.254, 00:04:02 ago, via Vlan33
> >> >> >> >> Route metric is 2560000512, traffic share count is 1
> >> >> >> >> Total delay is 20 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1
> Kbit
> >> >> >> >> Reliability 1/255, minimum MTU 1 bytes
> >> >> >> >> Loading 1/255, Hops 1
> >> >> >> >> Route tag 254
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> If I use that tag 254 in my route-map like this, because I know
> >> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >> my EIGRP neighbor is in AS 253:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> !
> >> >> >> >> route-map TAG permit 10
> >> >> >> >> match tag 254
> >> >> >> >> set tag 999
> >> >> >> >> !
> >> >> >> >> route-map TAG permit 90
> >> >> >> >> !
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> That prefixes go into OSPF without changed tag ??!! set tag 999
> >> >> >> >> didn't
> >> >> >> >> change tag. Why?
> >> >> >> >> If I put tag command under redistribute command then all
> prefixes
> >> >> >> >> will
> >> >> >> >> be tagged with 999.
> >> >> >> >> Right?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Mirco Orlandi
> >> >> >> >> <mirco.orlandi_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > Hi Ivan,
> >> >> >> >> > using "tag" inside redistribution statement, you are setting
> >> >> >> >> > tag
> >> >> >> >> > 999
> >> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> >> > all
> >> >> >> >> > routes you are redistributing.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > To match the task requirement, you have to set tag 999 only
> to
> >> >> >> >> > external
> >> >> >> >> > eigrp routes
> >> >> >> >> > On R1:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > route-map set-tag permit 10
> >> >> >> >> > match route-type external
> >> >> >> >> > set tag 999
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > route-map set-tag permit 20
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > router ospf 1
> >> >> >> >> > redistribute eigrp 1 subnets route-map set-tag
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > but..., if you prefere, you can set tag 999 inside statement
> >> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> >> > override
> >> >> >> >> > the tag for non-external routers:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > route-map set-tag permit 10
> >> >> >> >> > match route-type external
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > route-map set-tag permit 20
> >> >> >> >> > set tag 1
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > router ospf 1
> >> >> >> >> > redistribute eigrp 1 subnets tag 999 route-map set-tag
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > I labbed it with Adv.IP.Svcs 12.4(15)T8
> >> >> >> >> > I think first solution is more common, and clear.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > -mirco.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Ivan Hrvatska
> >> >> >> >> > <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Tagging eBGP prefixes. Hmm...I see why are you confused. I'm
> >> >> >> >> >> also
> >> >> >> >> >> confused. Cause when you redistribute BGP into EIGRP those
> >> >> >> >> >> prefixes
> >> >> >> >> >> are external to EIGRP. After that you redistribute them into
> >> >> >> >> >> OSPF.
> >> >> >> >> >> During that redistribution they will be tagged using match
> >> >> >> >> >> route-type
> >> >> >> >> >> external no matter what protocol originates that prefixes...
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Well, let's just say that task is "tag all external BGP
> >> >> >> >> >> prefixes
> >> >> >> >> >> with
> >> >> >> >> >> tag 999". ?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Marc La Porte
> >> >> >> >> >> <marc.a.laporte_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > Other question: do you mean tagging eBGP prefixes? Or
> >> >> >> >> >> > prefixes
> >> >> >> >> >> > which
> >> >> >> >> >> > were
> >> >> >> >> >> > redistributed into BGP?
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 13:04, Ivan Hrvatska
> >> >> >> >> >> > <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> How do you tag external BGP prefixes? Let's say you have
> >> >> >> >> >> >> two
> >> >> >> >> >> >> routers
> >> >> >> >> >> >> in EIGRP domain. One router (R2) runs EIGRP and BGP with
> >> >> >> >> >> >> some
> >> >> >> >> >> >> peers.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Other router runs EIGRP and it is also ASBR OSPF router
> >> >> >> >> >> >> (R1).
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On
> >> >> >> >> >> >> R1
> >> >> >> >> >> >> you redistribute EIGRP into OSPF and during
> redistribution
> >> >> >> >> >> >> you
> >> >> >> >> >> >> have
> >> >> >> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> tag BGP external routes with some tag. Is this enough:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map MAP per 10
> >> >> >> >> >> >> match route-type external
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map MAP per 100
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> router ospf 1
> >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute eigrp 1 subnets tag 999 route-map MAP
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> ??
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Mar 23 2010 - 17:29:18 ART