Re: sham-link

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:58:20 +0000

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:49, <ccie_ka_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi GS,
>
> currently I'm trying to configure and understanding a sham-link.
> I read that it must be a source of a 32 bit address. Let's say I need a loopback address 10.10.100.1/32.
> This loopback address should be in the MP-BGP and shouldn't be redistributed in the IGP ?
>
> Please can anyone confirm this ?

Hi,

If you expect someone to write "confirmed", I can do it, but...

Why don't you lab it up and prove it to yourself? What happens if it's
not /32? What happens if it is in IGP? What happens if it's not in
BGP? Have you tried these things? Do you know all of the "whys"?

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Mar 20 2010 - 12:58:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:35 ART