Re: sham-link

From: Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:39:40 +0200

That's correct,cannot be distributed in an IGP. Are you having problems with
it ?

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

On Mar 20, 2010 2:50 PM, <ccie_ka_at_gmx.de> wrote:

Hi GS,

currently I'm trying to configure and understanding a sham-link.
I read that it must be a source of a 32 bit address. Let's say I need a
loopback address 10.10.100.1/32.
This loopback address should be in the MP-BGP and shouldn't be redistributed
in the IGP ?

Please can anyone confirm this ?

Thanks

Dennis

--
GMX.at - Vsterreichs FreeMail-Dienst mit |ber 2 Mio Mitgliedern
E-Mail, SMS & mehr! Kostenlos: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atfreemail
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Mar 20 2010 - 15:39:40 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:35 ART