Re: Please confirm (conf#f4e9b34f94afb492a7d5dac928912a87)

I have checked the archives now and didn't find similar question that I
asked. So, I have followed all guidelines.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to a GroupStudy.com certification mailing list.
> Because
> the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be
> required
> to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
> spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
> Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
>
> By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
> 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
>
> First time posters to GroupStudy.com are required to agree to the
> GroupStudy terms and conditions.
> Replying to this email, certifies you have read and agree to the GroupStudy
> posting guidelines and terms and conditions.
>
> --- Original Message Follows ---
>
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:54:07 -0700
> Subject: ospf virtual link
> From: karthik thatikonda <get2explore_at_gmail.com>
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Hi GS,
>
> I read that the transit area between two ABR's when a virtual link is
> formed
> must be a stub area. One thing that stucks my mind is that the two ABR's
> would advertise Type 3 summary lsa for the default route into the transit
> area. Therefore, there is a loop here since the default route is advertised
> into the same area twice. Is this thinking correct? Can anyone clearly
> elaborate why the transit area must not be a stub area when we form a
> virtual link. Honestly, I haven't checked the archives but if there is one
> posted already please ignore and I will try to find it.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Karthik

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 25 2010 - 18:02:57 ART