Re: Mapping an RP to an specific group in IPV6

Hi,

Does anybody have any idea on how to accomplish this? I just cannot
get this to work.

Thanks again!

Jorge

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jorge Cortes
<jorge.cortes.cano_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> When trying to map an RP to an specific multicast ipv6 group how
> should the access-list be defined?
>
> For instance I'm trying to map the RP to just group FF08::8/128. I
> have tried with the following two access-list but none seems to work:
>
> ipv6 access-list LIMITGROUP
> permit ipv6 any host FF08::8
>
> ipv6 access-list LIMITGROUP
> permit ipv6 host FF08::8 any
>
> The ipv6 pim configuration is as follows:
>
> ipv6 pim bsr candidate bsr FC07:541::21B:2AFF:FE53:6838
> ipv6 pim bsr candidate rp FC07:541::21B:2AFF:FE53:6838 group-list LIMITGROUP
>
> However when I issue the command "show ipv6 pim range-list" I don't
> see an elected RP via BSR for any group, and when issue the command
> "show ipv6 mroute" I see that the RP is any (::)
>
> R1#sh ipv6 pim range-list
> Static SSM Exp: never Learnt from : ::
> FF33::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF34::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF35::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF36::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF37::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF38::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF39::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF3A::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF3B::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF3C::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF3D::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF3E::/32 Up: 00:36:23
> FF3F::/32 Up: 00:36:23
>
> R1#sh ipv6 mroute
> Multicast Routing Table
> Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group,
> C - Connected, L - Local, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,
> P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag, T - SPT-bit set,
> J - Join SPT
> Timers: Uptime/Expires
> Interface state: Interface, State
>
> (*, FF08::8), 00:36:15/never, RP ::, flags: SPCL
> Incoming interface: Null
> RPF nbr: ::
> Immediate Outgoing interface list:
> Serial0/0/0.1, Null, 00:36:15/never
>
> However when I remove the "group-list" argument from the candidate RP,
> the RP is elected for all multicast groups (which is expected); so I
> must be incorrectly defining the access-list, but I just don't know
> what the correct format is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jorge

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Feb 17 2010 - 17:10:47 ART