Re: Cisco 360 missing major items?

"2009::D" Aha! That's original Scott!

Charles Henson

|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Richard Bender <richardbender_at_gmx.com> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |ccielab_at_groupstudy.com |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |02/16/2010 03:42 PM |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: Cisco 360 missing major items? |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 Learning is a process. The details will be the same for a given
technology, that you'd use for OEQs, or configuration knowledge, or
troubleshooting. So if they cover the information about a technology, it
is likely their belief that it is therefore covered for each of the
phases of the lab exam.

The brain, however, doesn't always work that way. :) So it's good to
have targeted learning to FORCE the brain in a particular direction and
start thinking about that same knowledge in a different fashion. At
least that's why we do it.

So is it necessary? No. Is it helpful? I, at least, believe so. I'm
sure you will find people weighing in on both sides, but you know your
own brain and method of thinking better than anyone else does!

Cheers,

Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

evil_at_ine.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

Richard Bender wrote:

  Anyone else been looking at Cisco 360 to prepare for the CCIE lab? I have
been comparing different offerings and it looks like Cisco is missing a few
things. I see nothing specifically to cover the short answer questions and
nothing to cover the troubleshooting. When I called TWO of the training
companies for Cisco 360, I was told that troubleshooting was covered in the
labs and short answer questions were from the general knowledge obtained.
But I do not see a specific study materials for either of these components
of the lab test. Are these things necessary or is Cisco 360 enough to pass
the lab test?

  Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Feb 16 2010 - 15:53:52 ART