Re: OT:Voice Gateway & CUCM Problem

Ahh ok much clear now (I forgot this was a FXO hehe). The IOS TCL scripts do
have a lot of bugs. I would suggest upgrading to the latest available, and
open a TAC Case, we've faced similar strange issues with them with one
customer here.

Regards

Farrukh

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:17 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> This is an analog FXO port. So the whole number is sent.
> Plus I am able to dial into the number from outside (mobile for instance)
> and reach the router (even the script works).The problem is that when I
> attempt to place a call towards an internal extension (Post script) the
> debug voice dial-peer many times shows me a different number/extension than
> the one I have dialed, other times it works. I can't understand the reason.
>
> Thank You farrukh for your continuous help & support:)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Farrukh Haroon <farrukhharoon_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> If you have DID, the provider will only send the last 3 or 4 digits (at
>> least this is how STC does it in Saudi), not all 7.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Farrukh
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:11 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I have an FXO port connected to PSTN. I am trying to place a call from
>>> outside to inside by just dialling into the analog port number, which
>>> after
>>> a couple of rings opens a secondary tone and then I dial an internal
>>> extension. The problem I am facing is related to digit collection; where
>>> the
>>> digits I am dialling are not always the digits I see in the debug voice
>>> dial-peer inout for a reason I can't understand and this leads to the
>>> call
>>> being unrouted properly. I have tried this without TCL script (by
>>> dialling
>>> into analog line which opens secondary dial tone) and with TCL script
>>> (simple script which just welcomes the caller and asks him to put
>>> extension).The weird thing is that it works sometimes & other times it
>>> doesn't work.
>>>
>>> Any help will be much appreciated!
>>>
>>> Best Regards.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, mohammed shoeb ahmed <mdshoeb_at_gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Would you please clarify what you are trying to achieve here, if you
>>> are
>>> > testing auto attendant then "Connection Plar 600" would be needed under
>>> your
>>> > voice ports.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Mohammed Shoeb Ahmed
>>> >
>>> > Sr. Consultant,
>>> > CCIE 18379
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> KJ
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> KJ

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Feb 16 2010 - 21:43:02 ART