Depends on the situation at hand
Sent from my BlackBerry. smartphone from Zain Kenya
-----Original Message-----
From: <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:52:44
To: Jared Scrivener<lists_at_jaredscrivener.com>
Cc: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; Divin Mathew John<divinjohn_at_gmail.com>; Marcel Lammerse<m.lammerse_at_mac.com>; <nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: BGP/OSPF router-id mismatch and the BGP synchronization
rule
Seriously though. This feature seems to have no benefit at all.
From:
Jared Scrivener <lists_at_jaredscrivener.com>
To:
Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com
Cc:
Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, Marcel Lammerse <m.lammerse_at_mac.com>,
nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date:
02/13/2010 08:16 AM
Subject:
Re: BGP/OSPF router-id mismatch and the BGP synchronization rule
Sent by:
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
Who said the rules of networking had to be consistent? ;)
-- Cheers, Jared Scrivener CCSI #30878, CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining.com Sr. Technical Instructor YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! Training And Remote Racks available LinkedIn:www.linkedin.com/in/jaredscrivener On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:04 PM, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote: > Couple this with the fact that I can't even remember the last time I came > across a router with synchronization turned on and this becomes a nice > little gotcha. It's strange that the BGP process doesn't consider a route > good if it's protocols are using different router ID's. Shouldn't it > simply "trust" the IGP to make the right decision? Matching router ID's > don't buy you anything by themselves. There is still the potential for > loops if the BGP path doesn't match the OSPF one. Matching isn't even > possible with protocols such as RIP and EIGRP so that makes it even > stranger. Am I missing something here? > > > > From: > Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com> > To: > Marcel Lammerse <m.lammerse_at_mac.com> > Cc: > Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > Date: > 02/12/2010 11:17 PM > Subject: > Re: BGP/OSPF router-id mismatch and the BGP synchronization rule > Sent by: > <nobody_at_groupstudy.com> > > > > Check this out. http://www.internetworkexpert.com/rfc/rfc1403.txt > > > 3. BGP Identifier and OSPF router ID > > > > The BGP identifier MUST be the same as the OSPF router id at all > > times that the router is up. > > > > This characteristic is required for two reasons. > > > > i Synchronisation between OSPF and BGP > > > > Consider the scenario in which 3 ASBRs, RT1, RT2, and RT3, > > belong to the same autonomous system. > > > > > > +-----+ > > | RT3 | > > +-----+ > > | > > > > Autonomous System running OSPF > > > > / \ > > +-----+ +-----+ > > | RT1 | | RT2 | > > +-----+ +-----+ > > > > > > Both RT1 and RT2 have routes to an external network X and > > import it into the OSPF routing domain. RT3 is advertising > > the route to network X to other external BGP speakers. RT3 > > > > > > > > Varadhan [Page 5] > > > > RFC 1403 BGP OSPF Interaction January 1993 > > > > > > must use the OSPF router ID to determine whether it is using > > RT1 or RT2 to forward packets to network X and hence build the > > correct AS_PATH to advertise to other external speakers. > > > > More precisely, RT3 must determine which ASBR it is using to > > reach network X by matching the OSPF router ID for its route > > to network X with the BGP Identifier of one of the ASBRs, and > > use the corresponding route for further advertisement to > > external BGP peers. > > > > ii It will be convenient for the network administrator looking at > > an ASBR to correlate different BGP and OSPF routes based on > > the identifier. > > > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Marcel Lammerse <m.lammerse_at_mac.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I know this is not common these days, as BGP synchronization is turned > off > > by default in recent ios versions. However, I was wondering if anyone > knows > > why a Cisco router considers an OSPF route not synchronized, if the OSPF > > router id and BGP router id don't match. > > > > Is this an implementation-specfic thing or is there some protocol design > > thinking behind it? > > > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > > >Received on Sat Feb 13 2010 - 18:03:22 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART