On 2010-02-07 17:34, Iwan Hoogendoorn wrote:
> If this goed trough ,... this is just more proof the whole
> certification track stuff can be 1 big commercial pile ...
>
> I mean ... why be so greedy ...?
It is already present on some of the platforms and will be present
on new ones. Calling a vendor 'greedy' when it is robbed by people not
paying for licenses seems quite a remark. It doesn't hurt people using
normal products, and it would be really a story for Cisco to change
it's multibillion software development path and system just because
'there's dynamips!'. C'mon...
And when CCIE SP moves to - for example - IOS-XR, that's available for
CRS-1, 12k and ASR9k, will you call again Cisco 'greedy'? Because it
would cost a lot to build yourself a home lab out of them?
Think for a moment before spitting out clueless remarks and insult
people or companies. If it doesn't go through the 'wait 30 seconds and
read what I wrote' test, it is not worth sending. And if You don't
look at a CCIE being worth something for you, skip it please. Nobody
forces you to pass it.
-- "Everything will be okay in the end. | #ukasz Bromirski If it's not okay, it's not the end. | http://lukasz.bromirski.net Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Feb 07 2010 - 20:42:46 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART