Yeah, just recently (end last year) they added P2MP LSPs to 7200 code
(12.2(33)SRE as far as I remember). So it's about time to have some
more fun with dynamips :) Still a lot of arguing about where MPLS FRR
is such a good thing for multicast protection or it's something most
people can live without.
-- Petr Lapukhov, petr_at_INE.com CCIE #16379 (R&S/Security/SP/Voice) Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.INE.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Outside US: 775-826-4344 2010/2/4 Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com>: > The key thing to note is the lack of support on most platforms... > 7600's have it and IOS-XR (12k and CRS) I believe has it as well... > > All Juniper M, T and MX series have it (no idea on the J-series, haven't > tried, but I'd assume they did). > > VERY useful for NGN network deployments.... VERY much a pain in > mixed-vendor environments! :) > > Scott > > Petr Lapukhov wrote: > > Hi, > > Cisco has been active in IETF for P2MP LSP standartization using mLDP, > but they have adopted P2MP LSPs based on RSVP signaling, that Juniper > had for a long time. > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_te_p2mp.html > This feauture is relatively new, so you may want to consider using the > "classic" multicast routing techniques. > > HTH, > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 15:23:14 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART