Re: mLDP for mcast through MPLS network

From: Petr Lapukhov <petr_at_internetworkexpert.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:23:14 -0800

Yeah, just recently (end last year) they added P2MP LSPs to 7200 code
(12.2(33)SRE as far as I remember). So it's about time to have some
more fun with dynamips :) Still a lot of arguing about where MPLS FRR
is such a good thing for multicast protection or it's something most
people can live without.

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, petr_at_INE.com
CCIE #16379 (R&S/Security/SP/Voice)
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.INE.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
2010/2/4 Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com>:
>  The key thing to note is the lack of support on most platforms...
> 7600's have it and IOS-XR (12k and CRS) I believe has it as well...
>
> All Juniper M, T and MX series have it (no idea on the J-series, haven't
> tried, but I'd assume they did).
>
> VERY useful for NGN network deployments....  VERY much a pain in
> mixed-vendor environments!  :)
>
> Scott
>
> Petr Lapukhov wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  Cisco has been active in IETF for P2MP LSP standartization using mLDP,
>  but they have adopted P2MP LSPs based on RSVP signaling, that Juniper
>  had for a long time.
>  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_te_p2mp.html
>  This feauture is relatively new, so you may want to consider using the
>  "classic" multicast routing techniques.
>
>  HTH,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 15:23:14 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART