RE: CCIE RS Test

When I spoke with Marillio prior to his departure with Cisco, he
suggested that people get "right to the point." He said the people who
typically knew what they were talking about, wrote it in a sentence or
two...whereas the people who were trying to "bluff" their way through
it, wrote several paragraphs.

thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI# 30482
CEO / President
CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
Email: brad_at_ccbootcamp.com
Toll Free: 877-654-2243
International: +1-702-968-5100
Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
FAX: +1-702-446-8012
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Larry Hadrava
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:43 AM
To: Anthony Sequeira
Cc: adnasir_at_live.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CCIE RS Test

Anthony:
Well stated. I do not think there is a concise rule on using a few words
or
a few sentences. I've been telling folks - it depends........

-- 
Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203
Check Out MyBlog: http://ccie12203.wordpress.com/
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Anthony Sequeira
<asequeira_at_ine.com>wrote:
> I am going to do my Scott Morris impression here - "you do whatever
you
> need to do!"
>
> :-)
>
> Let me elaborate with a couple of examples I like to use in class...
>
> Let's say you get a question that asks "What IPv6 technology
effectively
> replaces the need for ARP?"
>
> Well, I am answering that question with exactly two words - Neighbor
> Discovery. In fact, you could technically get that question correct
with two
> letters - ND. Providing any more information might just get you in
trouble
> if you are wrong.
>
> Now, let us presume that I get a question regarding NAT and the four
NAT
> terms of inside local, inside global, outside local, and outside
global.
> Perhaps there is a diagram I need to interpret and choose the correct
term.
> And let us also say (and this happens a lot) that the diagram is very
vague,
> or maybe even erroneous. Well in this case, I am providing four
sentences
> describing each term briefly. I am going to ensure that the proctor is
> convinced I know my stuff!
>
> I hope this very simplified and brief discussion of Core Knowledge
strategy
> helps you.
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
> http://www.INE.com <http://www.ine.com/>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:53 AM, adnasir_at_live.com wrote:
>
> > I have heard mixed reviews as far as the CK/OEQ section is
concerned.
> Some have
> > said to be as concise as possible and others like yourself have said
to
> explain
> > in detail with 4-6 sentences if need be. Can anyone else shed light
onto
> this?
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > -Adnan
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >