I am going to do my Scott Morris impression here - "you do whatever you need to do!"
:-)
Let me elaborate with a couple of examples I like to use in class...
Let's say you get a question that asks "What IPv6 technology effectively replaces the need for ARP?"
Well, I am answering that question with exactly two words - Neighbor Discovery. In fact, you could technically get that question correct with two letters - ND. Providing any more information might just get you in trouble if you are wrong.
Now, let us presume that I get a question regarding NAT and the four NAT terms of inside local, inside global, outside local, and outside global. Perhaps there is a diagram I need to interpret and choose the correct term. And let us also say (and this happens a lot) that the diagram is very vague, or maybe even erroneous. Well in this case, I am providing four sentences describing each term briefly. I am going to ensure that the proctor is convinced I know my stuff!
I hope this very simplified and brief discussion of Core Knowledge strategy helps you.
Warmest Regards,
Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
http://www.INE.com
On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:53 AM, adnasir_at_live.com wrote:
> I have heard mixed reviews as far as the CK/OEQ section is concerned. Some have
> said to be as concise as possible and others like yourself have said to explain
> in detail with 4-6 sentences if need be. Can anyone else shed light onto this?
>
> TIA,
>
> -Adnan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jan 28 2010 - 12:03:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:42 ART