Hi all
i have posted this questions and now i am updating my experience , although
i have failed because of the OEQ , but i can say it was manageable if you
have a time to study , in my case it was introduced a month prior to my exam
, i have focused on the new tech and then got 2 questions in the new tech
which i answered and 2 old tech questions which i missed . so please study
all the blue print topics , READ , READ and READ
it is worth 4 points only and if you fail / fail
you can go back and front before the 30 min elapse or submit your questions
the remaining time you can invest in your lab
thx
dayaa
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Luan Nguyen <luan_at_netcraftsmen.net> wrote:
> I was hoping for a 21 points pass OEQs for the SP...but from what I heard,
> it's 4 points for pass and fail for fail.
>
> -Luan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Scott Morris
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 7:03 AM
> To: Nuno Reis
> Cc: Rick Mur; Anthony Fajri; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Sp OEQ
>
> In the v3 exam, the OEQs were worth 231 points. Back in October of last
> year, when the format changed to v4 this was completely rearranged as you
> noted there.
>
> Everyone SHOULD have been aware of this shift in points/requirements, as
> it was well documented throughout GS and CLN and other forums. I would
> hope that whatever bootcamp you took was back in the v3 blueprint. :)
>
> For OTHER tracks though, they are not on the same blueprint as R&S, so
> their point values (this thread was about SP) will more likely follow the
> old R&S v3 format.
>
> Scott
>
> Nuno Reis wrote:
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> I did the RS exam this month and it was declared on the booklet that OEQ
> follows a FAIL/PASS grading, and if you pass you will get 4 points, if you
> fail, you fail the entire exam. You need to get 3 correct questions to pass
> and they will only show you the oeq performance if you fail, i.e 0%, 25% or
> 50%. If you get 75%, which means a passing grade, you will see 100%,
> regardless if you got 75% or 100%. Of course, you only see performance
> percentage if you fail the exam globally, otherwise the you see the sacred
> number.
> On the bootcamp I attented last year, the instructor also referred 21
> points given to oeq but that wasn't what I saw on the "torture chamber". If
> any upcoming candidate have the opportunity the invest a couple of minutes
> to explore the electronic booklet, may confirm what I just said.
>
> Cheers,
> Nuno
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [ mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com ] On
> Behalf Of Rick Mur
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:41 AM
> To: Anthony Fajri
> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com Subject: Re: Sp OEQ
>
> I don't know what you mean about the material but ut will have the same
> concept as the R&S has. 21 points for OEQ and 79 for the configuration.
> You
> will not have access to the documentation and you can't consult the
> proctor
> for clarification.
>
> The questions are based on the current blueprint topics so that's where
> you
> will have questions on. They can be theory based or they can give you a
> topology and ask for something.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Rick Mur
> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Anthony Fajri <fajri_at_freebsd.or.id>
> wrote:
>
> Hi GS,
>
> any feedback on SP OeQ?
> is it 21 score concept as on RS?
> what about the material? is it text book material or hands on material?
>
> thanks and regards,
>
> -----
> Anthony Fajri http://fajri.freebsd.or.id
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:30 AM, JR Garcia <ttuner_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> id be interested in hearing any feedback as well.
> im not scheduled for another few months out.
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 4770 (20100114) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jan 26 2010 - 02:30:52 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:42 ART