Hi Experts,
Waiting for your Replies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Regards,
Gaurav
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Martin Dean <mdean_at_diatac.com> wrote:
> You are using the Study guide with a very old printing - my guess is a soft
> pdf version printing Oct 2004.
> You need the errata for it.
> It used to on the ciscopress.com site, but I cannot find it now.
> Email me offline I will send you my copy with all (and there are many)
> errors.
>
> Martin Dean
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gaurav Thukral" <pearlgaurav_at_gmail.com
> >
> To: "Group study <" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; "Ravi Singh" <
> way2ccie_at_googlemail.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: WFQ
>
>
>  Hi Ravi,
>>
>> The diagram shows a set of four flow queues, each with four packets of
>> varying lengths. For the sake of discussion, assume that the SN of the
>> previously sent packet is zero in this case. Each flow s first packet
>> arrives at the same instant in time, and all packets for all flows arrive
>> before any more packets can be taken from the WFQ queues.
>>
>>                                Flow 1
>>
>>                         1500 byte,
>> Packet4            Packet3              Packet1           Packet1
>>                         Precedence 0        SN=194,304,000
>> SN=145,728,000       SN=97,152,000     SN=48,576,000
>>
>>
>> Flow 2
>>
>>
>> Packet8            Packet7              Packet6           Packet5
>>                         1000 byte,          SN=129,536,000
>> SN=97,152,000        SN=65,536,000     SN=32,384,000
>>                         Precedence 0
>>
>>
>> Flow 3
>>
>>
>> Packet12           Packet11             Packet10          Packet9
>>                         500 byte,           SN=65,536,000
>> SN=48,576,000        SN=32,384,000     SN=16,192,000
>>                         Precedence 0
>>
>>
>> Flow 4
>>
>>
>> Packet16           Packet15             Packet14          Packet13
>>                         100 byte,           SN=12,954,600
>> SN=9,715,200         SN=6,553,600      SN=3,238,400
>>                         Precedence 0
>>
>> For the record, the order the packets would exit the interface, assuming
>> no
>> other events occur, is 13 first, then 14, followed by 15, 16, 9, 5, 10, 1,
>> 11, 6, 12, 2, 7, 8, 3, 4.
>>
>> My question is Why Packet 5 is dequeue first before Packet 10 although
>> both
>> have same SN.?
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.141/2622 - Release Date: 01/14/10
> 19:35:00
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jan 16 2010 - 14:49:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART