Re: Router redundancy

Hello Experts,

Just click the link for the topology view:
http://www.gliffy.com/pubdoc/1951181/L.jpg

Pls advice friends for the query in above mail..

Thanks,

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:04 PM, andy thomas <thomasandy32_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello
>
> Diagram:
> ISP-1 ISP-1
>
> | |
>
> | |
> CORE-1-------------CORE-2
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> PE-2 PE-1
> 10.28.40.41/29 | |
> 10.28.40.33/29
> |
> |
> .42 | |
> .34
> firewall-2
> firewall-1
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
> ----------------------------------
> |
> WEB SERVER (10.10.10.1)
>
> I want to route traffic to web server I'm using static routes pointing to a
> respective next-hop on a particular router,the devices on customer end
> firewall is ASA, customer has asked for the preferred interface from
> firewall-1, i have configured that by increasing the local preference of the
> route
>
> The link between the distribution switches and the core is MPLS and the
> customer is configured in the VRF.
>
> Now the issue is:
>
> customer says that when the firewall-1 fails firewall-2 will be active by
> the same inside interface IP of firewall-1, if it so then all the traffic
> destined to web server from PE-2 to a next-hop 10.28.40.42 will drop,so in
> this situation what techniques we shld apply,The subnet between the 2
> firewall are different.
>
>
> Any link or configuration example which will help me.
> Thanks

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jan 10 2010 - 17:18:27 ART