Re: OT: SP workbooks

INE SP workbooks are not that great.....the problem is that they have
not updated them for long time.....try comparing the outline of INE
with Antonio's blueprint and u will come to know how much they are
missing.....i hope the r working on the updates....bc on rest of the
tracks they are really doing fine......CoDs from IE are definitely
perfect...A must for SP.....

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys and Gals,
> I am thinking of buying a vendor workbook set for SP track and contemplating
> IPX vs INE. The reason for other vendors to be left alone for now is
> technology workbook I am interested in along with full-labs.
>
> Price-wise it is more beneficial to buy INE set, one gets two workbooks (Vol
> 1 and Vol 2), plus Dynamips version for full-lab one plus Technology CoD,
> with recent promotion it is under 500 USD.
>
> IPX has end-of-year promotion for two workbooks (Vol 1 with 25 focus labs
> and Vol 2 with 10 full labs) for exactly 500 USD, this promotion is not on
> the web. Dynamips topologies are also available from IPX if I remember
> right.
>
> So the Q is about quality. IPX claims they have an updated set of SP
> workbooks comparing to those ppl would use several months ago. I have also
> heard some feedbacks mentioning INE workbooks are sometimes erroneous and
> little has been done to fix this over the last year or so. The benefit of
> INE is obviously CoD included in the set.
>
> I just wanted to hear you opinions guys, sorry if it disrupts your studies.
>
> Cheers,
> A.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Dec 14 2009 - 16:27:12 ART