Re: Dual DMVPN cloud with 1 hub terminating two tunnels, equal

What does the cef table look like?
have you tried changing the eigrp lb method to 'per-packet'

Ajaz Nawaz
CCIE#15721

2009/11/25 jeremy co <jeremy.cool14_at_gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> I ran Dual DMVPN cloud with 1 hub terminating two tunnels
> topology;everything works fine except after changing BW on tunnel
> interfaces
> ,still I have equal cost path problem on spoke, so I got two path toward
> destinations from spoke to another spoke.
>
>
> Hub:
>
> interface Tunnel0
> bandwidth 1000
> ip address 200.0.0.7 255.255.255.0
> no ip redirects
> no ip next-hop-self eigrp 101
> ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
> ip nhrp network-id 127
> no ip split-horizon eigrp 101
> no ip split-horizon
> tunnel source Loopback0
> tunnel mode gre multipoint
>
>
> interface Tunnel1
> bandwidth 10
> ip address 201.0.0.7 255.255.255.0
> no ip redirects
> no ip next-hop-self eigrp 101
> ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
> ip nhrp network-id 201
> no ip split-horizon eigrp 101
> no ip split-horizon
> tunnel source Loopback1
> tunnel mode gre multipoint
>
>
> Spoke :
>
> interface Tunnel1 ip address 201.0.0.6 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ip
> nhrp
> map multicast dynamic ip nhrp map 201.0.0.7 7.7.7.71 ip nhrp map multicast
> 7.7.7.71 ip nhrp network-id 201 ip nhrp nhs 201.0.0.7 tunnel source
> Loopback1 tunnel mode gre multipoint interface Tunnel0 ip address 200.0.0.6
> 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ip nhrp map multicast dynamic ip nhrp map
> 200.0.0.7 7.7.7.7 ip nhrp map multicast 7.7.7.7 ip nhrp network-id 127 ip
> nhrp nhs 200.0.0.7 tunnel source Loopback0 tunnel mode gre multipoint
>
> routing table on spoke :
>
> Rack1R6#sh ip route ei 142.4.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D EX
> 142.4.64.0
> [170/2585600256] via 201.0.0.7, 00:19:09, Tunnel1 [170/2585600256] via
> 200.0.0.7, 00:19:09, Tunnel0 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets D EX
> 10.0.23.0 [170/2585600256] via 201.0.0.7, 00:40:52, Tunnel1
> [170/2585600256]
> via 200.0.0.2, 00:40:52, Tunnel0 D EX 10.0.35.0 [170/2585600256] via
> 201.0.0.7, 00:19:09, Tunnel1 [170/2585600256] via 200.0.0.7, 00:19:09,
> Tunnel0
>
>
> why changing bw didn't affect IGP metric ?
>
>
> Regards,
> Jeremy
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Nov 26 2009 - 08:03:11 ART