Re: R&S Written v4.0 Beta (Results Are Shipping and Quick

On the other hand 640-503 and 640-504 are valid for CCDP as well and
don't expire. ;-) I was lucky to have them from 2001 so I just had to
clear ARCH (in 2009) to fulfill CCDP.
And indeed, all 642-* tests are valid for 3 years to be able to make a
tick on your progress list.

Cheers,
A.

Florian Frotzler wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I had the same issue, if your composite from the CCNP is an older
> version as that on the current CCDP, you need to do it again for the
> CCDP.
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
>
> 2009/11/12 Paul Cosgrove <paul.cosgrove.groupstudy_at_gmail.com>:
>
>> Interesting, thanks Scott.
>>
>> I'll have to have a chat with them then as I have CCIE, ARCH and CCNP;
>> though I took the latter quite a few years ago. As far as I can see in the
>> certification progress tool all the necessary boxes are ticked, but perhaps
>> I need the newer composite exam to complete.
>>
>> Another exam I passed this year is also not shown as completed, so perhaps
>> there are a few bugs with the tool.
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Scott M Vermillion <
>> scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This link would seem to answer the question (at least to my satisfaction):
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/le2/le37/le5/learning_certification_type_home.html
>>>
>>> The first prerequisite is "valid CCNA and CCDA or any CCIE
>>> certification..."
>>>
>>> Then you need 642-873 ARCH (obviously) and then you choose between the -892
>>> composite or you do -901 BSCI and -812 BCMSN.
>>>
>>> So it would seem that the CCIE gets you out of the associate-level
>>> obligation but all professional-level obligations must still be met. I
>>> can't say that I agree with that. If someone passes both the CCIE written
>>> and the lab, I think we have a good measure of their routing and switching
>>> abilities. At least if the CCIE in question is the R&S track. Maybe not so
>>> much with the others...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:41 , Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 23:18, Samurai Jack
>>>
>>>> <rs_at_resilient-consulting.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Marko, I have asked Cert Support. Will post their reply here in
>>>>> case
>>>>> it helps someone.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This has been discussed back and forth on GS before - you may even
>>>> have luck searching the archives.
>>>>
>>>> I would even go with 60% certainty that with CCIE #, you only need
>>>> ARCH for CCDP - but I could be *very* wrong on that. The best approach
>>>> is to see what cert. support says... which reminds me, I have to see
>>>> why I'm not recertified. Joy.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>
>>>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>>> Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Nov 12 2009 - 20:15:42 ART