Re: FRTS QOS Question

From: <armylegionmedic_at_aol.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:54:23 -0500

Awesome, thank you very much.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jobby Jose <jobbykjose_at_gmail.com>
To: armylegionmedic_at_aol.com
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Sent: Tue, Nov 3, 2009 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: FRTS QOS Question

de-list/de-group is used to set the traffic as "discard eligible". so the deny
statement in access-list ensure the routing protocol traffic is not marked as
discard eligible. During traffic congestion, the permitted traffic will get
dropped. hence it makes sense..

Best Regards
Jobby Jose

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:52 AM, <armylegionmedic_at_aol.com> wrote:

Hello All,

   I am running into an issue on a scenario I am up against. Ok, so Lets

assume that there is traffic congestion on the Frame Relay link between two

routers. I need to configure a QOS Policy so that none of my Routing Protocol

traffic is dropped when the link becomes congested. My CIR should be set to

1000000 and a mincir of 512000.

My original thought is to do the following

class-map match-all routing1

match ip precedence network internet

policy-map routing2

class routing1

priority perce 5

class class-default

fair-queue

map-class frame-relay frts

frame-relay cir 1000000

frame-relay mincir 512000

frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn

service-policy output routing2

int s2/0

frame-relay traffic-shaping

frame-relay class frts

Or is this solution better?

access-list 100 deny pim any any

access-list 100 deny ospf any any

access-list 100 deny eigrp any any

access-list 100 deny udp any any eq rip

access-list 100 deny tcp any eq bgp any

access-list 100 deny tcp any any eq bgp

access-list 100 permit ip any any

frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip list 100

map-class frame-relay frts

frame-relay cir 1000000

frame-relay mincir 512000

frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn

int s2/0

frame-relay traffic-shaping

frame-relay de-group 1 102/201

frame-relay interface-dlci 102/201

class frts

The second one I dont feel makes sense since it is saying to deny, but maybe
I

am missing something.

Thanks,

James

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Nov 03 2009 - 19:54:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART