Re: CCIE R&S v4.0 results on as good as I hoped

OK. I can remember when the lab went from two days from one. I can remember
when the lab had no OEQ (like most of us). I also remember a few revisions
in between. Thru various emails I have been a member of this study group
thru most of that. Yes, there was concern and even panic by some folks
during the changes. There is a difference here that bothers me. In past
experiences, the first folks to take the exam b1tched about the
differences. In our case, we're seeing people complain about the
presentation. We're also seeing complaints about the breadth of the
material. Go dig the archives. Past complaints during changes were not the
same. This is what concerns me and is the reason I'm going to let this
version burn in before I consider signing up. I think there is a legitimate
concern here.

Charles Henson

                                                                                                                        
  From: Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>
                                                                                                                        
  To: rakesh m <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>
                                                                                                                        
  Cc: Bobola Oke <okebobola_at_gmail.com>, Dark Fiber <darkfiber08_at_gmail.com>, Christopher Copley
              <copley.chris_at_gmail.com>, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>, Evan Weston <evan_weston_at_hotmail.com>,
              Pach <pachgus_at_gmail.com>, Justin Mitchell <jgmitchell_at_gmail.com>, pocjamin <pocjamin_at_gmail.com>, ccielab
              <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
                                                                                                                        
  Date: 11/03/2009 02:31 PM
                                                                                                                        
  Subject: Re: CCIE R&S v4.0 results on as good as I hoped
                                                                                                                        

> I can remember when the lab changed from the 2 day format to the 1 day
> format. This was back in October of 2001 as I recall. This was shortly
> after I started studying for the lab.
>
> The conversations were similiar to what I am seeing here since this
latest
> change.
>
> We were all bantering back and forth with many negative comments and even
> pondering if it was possible to be "compressed" into a 1 day format.
>
> We all know that it was possible and there were some pains at first then
> as well, but it all worked out. I think that these changes, given time,
> will work out as well.
>
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203
>

2009/11/4 rakesh m <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>

> For people who have been in this mailing list for years .. was the
> situation
> of panic same when people heard the transition between rs version 2 to rs
> version 3 ?
>
> just keen !
>
>
> --
> I have super powers i just dont wanna show you..
>
> http://diaryofccie.blogspot.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Sent from Karnataka, India
Dale Carnegie <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/765.html>  - "Any fool
can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do."
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net