Re: CCIE R&S v4.0 results on as good as I hoped

From: Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:46:07 -0500

You are wiser than your years young man. Even if you are 90. There are
differences. No one is reporting a pass. That is different. We are
into the third week now and no one is sayng they have passed yet. The
solution is simple. We should take Narbik's advice and spend our time
studying until we know enough to pass. No cheat sheets this time and
this is the biggest change. I have to go in the corner and study. I do
not know enough.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com> wrote:
> OK. I can remember when the lab went from two days from one. I can remember
> when the lab had no OEQ (like most of us). I also remember a few revisions
> in between. Thru various emails I have been a member of this study group
> thru most of that. Yes, there was concern and even panic by some folks
> during the changes. There is a difference here that bothers me. In past
> experiences, the first folks to take the exam b1tched about the
> differences. In our case, we're seeing people complain about the
> presentation. We're also seeing complaints about the breadth of the
> material. Go dig the archives. Past complaints during changes were not the
> same. This is what concerns me and is the reason I'm going to let this
> version burn in before I consider signing up. I think there is a legitimate
> concern here.
>
> Charles Henson
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>
>
> To: rakesh m <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>
>
> Cc: Bobola Oke <okebobola_at_gmail.com>, Dark Fiber <darkfiber08_at_gmail.com>, Christopher Copley
> <copley.chris_at_gmail.com>, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>, Evan Weston <evan_weston_at_hotmail.com>,
> Pach <pachgus_at_gmail.com>, Justin Mitchell <jgmitchell_at_gmail.com>, pocjamin <pocjamin_at_gmail.com>, ccielab
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>
> Date: 11/03/2009 02:31 PM
>
> Subject: Re: CCIE R&S v4.0 results on as good as I hoped
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> I can remember when the lab changed from the 2 day format to the 1 day
>> format. This was back in October of 2001 as I recall. This was shortly
>> after I started studying for the lab.
>>
>> The conversations were similiar to what I am seeing here since this
> latest
>> change.
>>
>> We were all bantering back and forth with many negative comments and even
>> pondering if it was possible to be "compressed" into a 1 day format.
>>
>> We all know that it was possible and there were some pains at first then
>> as well, but it all worked out. I think that these changes, given time,
>> will work out as well.
>>
>>
>> Larry Hadrava
>> CCIE #12203
>>
>
>
> 2009/11/4 rakesh m <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>
>
>> For people who have been in this mailing list for years .. was the
>> situation
>> of panic same when people heard the transition between rs version 2 to rs
>> version 3 ?
>>
>> just keen !
>>
>>
>> --
>> I have super powers i just dont wanna show you..
>>
>> http://diaryofccie.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from Karnataka, India
> Dale Carnegie <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/765.html> - "Any fool
> can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do."
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Nov 03 2009 - 16:46:07 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART