RE: frame relay switch

From: Nathan Richie <nathanr_at_boice.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:01:21 -0400

Not to mention the rolling blackouts :)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Scott Morris
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 12:34 PM
To: Rick Mur
Cc: smorris_at_ine.com; Iwan Hoogendoorn; belletjetrekken; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: frame relay switch

Yeah well, surprises abound. And yes, I agree about basing the
equipment in SJC as it's also one of the most expensive places in the
country for electricity... But what do I know? ;)

I'm sure to someone it makes perfect sense. *shrug*

Scott

Rick Mur wrote:
> Mm fun fact, I thought Cisco wanted to get rid of most datacenter and
> lab stuff in San Jose as it's expensive and the seismic activity makes
> it not really a great spot for it.
>
> Of course, Frame-Relay is somehow Cisco's little baby as they can't
> get rid of it ;-) So yes, frame switch config is still possible, then
> again configuration is just easy. (It's quite funny that CCSI
> candidates are totally shocked when they get to troubleshoot and
> configure a frame switch as it's their job to do when they teach
> classes :-)
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Rick Mur
> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
> Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
> On 25 okt 2009, at 14:40, Scott Morris wrote:
>
>> That would, however, be an impressive feat for a remote-rack. ;) ALL
>> racks are in San Jose now (for R&S fully).
>>
>> Small chance means you should still have a clue! Lest the testing karma
>> smite thee.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>>
>> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>>
>> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>
>> evil_at_ine.com
>>
>>
>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>
>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>>
>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>
>> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>>
>>
>> Knowledge is power.
>>
>> Power corrupts.
>>
>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>
>>
>>
>> Rick Mur wrote:
>>> You definitely DON'T have to do any cabling. The racks are in some
>>> locations not even there.
>>> Troubleshooting is definitely included, for the R&S exam I don't see
>>> that you have to configure THE frame switch (as it's probably shared
>>> between racks). You might have to configure a router to be a frame
>>> switch, but that's a very small chance, back-2-back frame switching is
>>> definitely a topic you will want to prepare yourself for.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Rick Mur
>>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
>>> Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>>
>>> On 24 okt 2009, at 14:21, Scott Morris wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frame switch MAY be preconfigured. But it has been noted that
>>>> candidates MAY be responsible for configuring it as well.
>>>>
>>>> Assume nothing. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
>>>> #4713,
>>>>
>>>> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>>>>
>>>> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>>>
>>>> evil_at_ine.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>>>>
>>>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>>>
>>>> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Knowledge is power.
>>>>
>>>> Power corrupts.
>>>>
>>>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Iwan Hoogendoorn wrote:
>>>>> Frame relay is preconfigured but I believe troubleshooting on
>>>>> framerelay is still on...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found
> at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Oct 25 2009 - 13:01:21 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:00 ART