Re: need some help on object tracking

Ok. Thanks

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> That isnt needed.! At first i thot i would point the static route towards a
> NULL0. then i need reverse logic.! if R2---R3 is DOWN then ip route shud be
> TRUE.! so for turning the DOWN to TRUE i used track 100 with boolean AND and
> NOT inside... Not needed in this config though! :P
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <
> security.goodie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> Thanks for the replies. Divin, your config would do my job...Thanks..
>>
>> But i dont understand why there is these commands.
>>
>> track 100 list boolean and
>> object 1 not
>>
>> Garry,
>> This is not for ccie lab requirement, but for my work.. we have two
>> gateways which provide static route to one destination. Primary router will
>> be created with static route pointing to a tunnel. And the tunnel should be
>> brought down when there is no reachability to the destination network. I
>> have issue with "ip route ..... track" command because i run older ios
>> (12.2) .. so only way is to use GRE tunnel.
>>
>> Secondary router i create same static route , but a floating one..
>>
>> Thanks and Warm Regards
>> Thameem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> This shud help you ..
>>> http://www.shafagh.net/2008/05/ccie-lab-ip-sla-with-hsrp.html
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:29 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would study this for use with HSRP.
>>>>
>>>> "Have local HSRP become standby when the loopback0 of router4 is
>>>> unavailable"
>>>>
>>>> Easy to test this config as well. HTH
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:37 AM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > not sure why you would ever do this (well the CCIE lab i guess??? and
>>>> i
>>>> > used
>>>> > static routes i guess you could do the same with tracking and dynmaic
>>>> > routes??? not sure about that one...) or if this meets the
>>>> requirements but
>>>> > it 'works' for lack of a better term...
>>>> >
>>>> > Router1---(f0/0 1.1.1.2), int tunnel 200 192.168.1.1)
>>>> > ip sla monitor 2
>>>> > type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 100.100.100.1
>>>> > frequency 30
>>>> > ip sla monitor schedule 2 life forever start-time now
>>>> >
>>>> > track 2 rtr 2 reachability
>>>> > interface Tunnel200
>>>> > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
>>>> > keepalive 10 3
>>>> > tunnel source 1.1.1.2
>>>> > tunnel destination 200.200.200.1
>>>> >
>>>> > ip route 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.1 10 track 2
>>>> > ip route 100.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.1 100
>>>> > ip route 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 22
>>>> >
>>>> > |
>>>> > |
>>>> > |
>>>> > Router 0 ----(f0/0 1.1.1.1, f0/1 3.3.3.1, int tunnel 200 192.168.1.2)
>>>> > |
>>>> > |
>>>> > |
>>>> > Router 2---(Loop 0 100.100.100.1, f0/0 3.3.3.2)
>>>> >
>>>> > R1:
>>>> > R1#sh ip route
>>>> > Gateway of last resort is not set
>>>> > S 200.200.200.0/24 [10/0] via 1.1.1.1
>>>> > 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>> > C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
>>>> > 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>> > S 100.100.100.0 [100/0] via 1.1.1.1
>>>> > R 3.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:03, FastEthernet0/0
>>>> > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel200
>>>> > R1#sh ip int br
>>>> > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
>>>> > Protocol
>>>> > FastEthernet0/0 1.1.1.2 YES manual up
>>>> > up
>>>> > FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively
>>>> down
>>>> > down
>>>> > Tunnel200 192.168.1.1 YES manual up
>>>> > up
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > R2:
>>>> > R2(config)#int loopback 0 ***SHUTTING DOWN THE TRACKED 100.100.100.1
>>>> > HERE****
>>>> > R2(config-if)#shut
>>>> > R2(config-if)#
>>>> > *Mar 1 00:30:12.535: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Loopback0, changed
>>>> state
>>>> > to
>>>> > administratively down
>>>> > *Mar 1 00:30:13.535: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
>>>> > Loopback0, changed state to down
>>>> > R2(config-if)#do sh ip int br
>>>> > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
>>>> > Protocol
>>>> > FastEthernet0/0 3.3.3.2 YES manual up
>>>> > up
>>>> > FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively
>>>> down
>>>> > down
>>>> > Loopback0 100.100.100.1 YES manual administratively
>>>> down
>>>> > down
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > R1: wait for the KEEPALIVES to KICK IN
>>>> > R1#
>>>> > *Mar 1 02:24:08.035: %TRACKING-5-STATE: 2 rtr 2 reachability Up->Down
>>>> > *Mar 1 02:24:24.035: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
>>>> > Tunnel200, changed state to down
>>>> > R1#sh ip route
>>>> > Gateway of last resort is not set
>>>> > S 200.200.200.0/24 is directly connected, Null0
>>>> > 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>> > C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
>>>> > 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>> > S 100.100.100.0 [100/0] via 1.1.1.1
>>>> > R 3.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0
>>>> > R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0
>>>> >
>>>> > R1#sh ip int br
>>>> > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
>>>> > Protocol
>>>> > FastEthernet0/0 1.1.1.2 YES manual up
>>>> > up
>>>> > FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively
>>>> down
>>>> > down
>>>> > Tunnel200 192.168.1.1 YES manual up
>>>> > down
>>>> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <
>>>> > security.goodie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > dears I have a scenario like this.. can some one give some solution?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Router1
>>>> > > |
>>>> > > |
>>>> > > |
>>>> > > Router 2
>>>> > > |
>>>> > > |
>>>> > > |
>>>> > > Router 3 ---(10.119.0.0)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Router1 and Router2 should have interface tunnel up and running. In
>>>> > router
>>>> > > 2 , i have to create an object tracking(IPSLA) on one IP
>>>> (10.119.0.2)
>>>> > which
>>>> > > is beyound Router 3. When the IP is not reachable, i have to bring
>>>> down
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > interface tunnel between Router 1 and Router 2.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Can some one help?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Thameem
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Garry L. Baker
>>>> >
>>>> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Will Rogers <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1220.html> - "Our
>>> constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators."
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Will Rogers <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1220.html> - "Our
> constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators."

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Oct 19 2009 - 10:46:51 ART