Yeah, and in fact there are too many options!!!
I did not think of this tunnel mode simply because everything was working
fine. ipv6ip would have been a better choice than just the default tunnel
mode.
The lab did not say "be smart and use the best tunnel mode" .... Now I
know ... (just wish I could get smart!)
;-)
Thanks Scott.
I have actually written this down. I need to train myself to type "tunnel
mode ?" ... this will help remind me to choose the best mode. Thanks Scott,
team,
Andrew
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:
> Know your options.
>
> IPv6IP is ONE of them. Are there others that will work? ;)
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> evil_at_ine.com
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
>
> ALL From_NJ wrote:
> > Hey team,
> >
> > If you run ipv6 addressing and routing over a tunnel, do you still need
> the
> > tunnel mode "ipv6ip"?
> >
> > I had to connect two 'islands' of ipv6 with a tunnel.
> >
> > I was allowed to add another ipv4 and ipv6 network. Pretty easy huh ...
> and
> > all seemed to work. The solution guide included the tunnel mode ipv6ip.
> > Would adding this command get me anything extra?
> >
> > Many TIA,
> >
> >
>
-- Andrew Lee Lissitz all.from.nj_at_gmail.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Oct 18 2009 - 00:00:38 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:00 ART