Re: QOS Bandwith command not accepted on SVI

Hi Mike,

  Thanks for the classification ....The reason why asked for whether you
need to queue during congestion is,If we try to use policing,as per my
understanding it doesn't queue and that may be the concern......

In these 6748 you may acheive the above requirement by using mls qos (SRR)
but the problem is, it may support only 2 egress queues(so may not be able
to accomdate different bandwidth weight assignment based on each
customer)....Kindly refer the documentation for mls qos and SRR support on
those line cards with respect to IOS you are using

Also if possible try to find/verify an ethernet card with SIP support which
I think may support your config

Expert in the group may add or suggest you some solution for your
requirement.

Thanks

Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:18 PM, mike arnold <haynessmith70_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi ,
>
> i thought about this i can just allow subset of traffic which i need to
> assign bandwith i will allow through poilce CIR and class class-default also
> with different police, Or suggest me any other solution
>
> I didnt understood what r u asking (it has to be queued when congestion
> occurs ) i was trying to configure CBWFQ but the command rejected on SVI,
>
> Platform: 6500 NEB-A and Model No WS-X6748-GE-TX and the IOS
> s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH.bin.
>
> Thanks
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Is it ok to police it based on youre SLA or it has to be queued when
>> congestion occurs ? on the SVI ,if so, is that supported ? .......Also whats
>> the platform of the Core PE device and the Gig Module which you have
>> configured as trunk port ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:44 AM, mike arnold <haynessmith70_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Dears,
>>>
>>> Topology:
>>>
>>> Its a Carrier Supporting Carrier Scenario.
>>>
>>>
>>> A------DS/PE--------------CORE/P---------ISP/PE-------P---------ISP/PE------B
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The link between Core and ISP is back to back VRF connected via a layer 2
>>> trunk.The ISP is creating a sub-interfaces on his 3800 router with
>>> encapsulation and vlan number. AND on Core am creating a SVI with a same
>>> vlan number and ip address within the subnet. Am trying to match packets
>>> by
>>> access-list on core and applying a dedicated bandwith for the particular
>>> customer A as per the SLA with the customer, The bandwith command is not
>>> accepted on the SVI.It give me this error, " bandwidth command is not
>>> supported for this interface""
>>>
>>> The link between Distribution and core is 10 GIG ,I don't want to limit
>>> bandwith on distribution switch outbound direction because as i want
>>> client
>>> to use 10Gig interface between Distribution and core. I want to implement
>>> a
>>> QOS on egress interface of each VRF on Core facing to ISP
>>>
>>> What is the alternate solution u experts can give me.
>>> Each customer VRF for example:(Customer A) is associated with SVI virtual
>>> interface on 6500 (Core) and traffic is passed to customer B.
>>>
>>> Configs Below:
>>>
>>> BGP is routing protocol between CORE nd ISP.
>>>
>>> ON 3800 router (ISP End)
>>> int gig0/0
>>> no shut
>>> no ip add
>>>
>>> int gig0/0.1
>>> no shut
>>> encapsulation dot1q 50
>>> ip vrf forwarding XX
>>> ip add 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.254
>>> ON MY END (CORE)
>>>
>>> int gig5/1
>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>> switch mode trunk
>>>
>>> int vlan 50
>>> ip vrf forwarding customer A
>>> ip add 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.254.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 13 2009 - 14:01:53 ART