Re: QOS Bandwith command not accepted on SVI

Hi ,

i thought about this i can just allow subset of traffic which i need to
assign bandwith i will allow through poilce CIR and class class-default also
with different police, Or suggest me any other solution

I didnt understood what r u asking (it has to be queued when congestion
occurs ) i was trying to configure CBWFQ but the command rejected on SVI,

Platform: 6500 NEB-A and Model No WS-X6748-GE-TX and the IOS
s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH.bin.

Thanks
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> Is it ok to police it based on youre SLA or it has to be queued when
> congestion occurs ? on the SVI ,if so, is that supported ? .......Also whats
> the platform of the Core PE device and the Gig Module which you have
> configured as trunk port ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:44 AM, mike arnold <haynessmith70_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dears,
>>
>> Topology:
>>
>> Its a Carrier Supporting Carrier Scenario.
>>
>>
>> A------DS/PE--------------CORE/P---------ISP/PE-------P---------ISP/PE------B
>>
>>
>>
>> The link between Core and ISP is back to back VRF connected via a layer 2
>> trunk.The ISP is creating a sub-interfaces on his 3800 router with
>> encapsulation and vlan number. AND on Core am creating a SVI with a same
>> vlan number and ip address within the subnet. Am trying to match packets
>> by
>> access-list on core and applying a dedicated bandwith for the particular
>> customer A as per the SLA with the customer, The bandwith command is not
>> accepted on the SVI.It give me this error, " bandwidth command is not
>> supported for this interface""
>>
>> The link between Distribution and core is 10 GIG ,I don't want to limit
>> bandwith on distribution switch outbound direction because as i want
>> client
>> to use 10Gig interface between Distribution and core. I want to implement
>> a
>> QOS on egress interface of each VRF on Core facing to ISP
>>
>> What is the alternate solution u experts can give me.
>> Each customer VRF for example:(Customer A) is associated with SVI virtual
>> interface on 6500 (Core) and traffic is passed to customer B.
>>
>> Configs Below:
>>
>> BGP is routing protocol between CORE nd ISP.
>>
>> ON 3800 router (ISP End)
>> int gig0/0
>> no shut
>> no ip add
>>
>> int gig0/0.1
>> no shut
>> encapsulation dot1q 50
>> ip vrf forwarding XX
>> ip add 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.254
>> ON MY END (CORE)
>>
>> int gig5/1
>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>> switch mode trunk
>>
>> int vlan 50
>> ip vrf forwarding customer A
>> ip add 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.254.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 13 2009 - 22:18:13 ART