Re: ospf issue

I would suggest labbing it up ... it is not hard to recreate this with an
incorrect network statement. Also, applying configs to a parent interface
and not the sub-interface can also produce similar results.

Just a thought ...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:40 AM, aashish kapoor <operationccie_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Rick,
>
> I cannot share the config as it is part of real network but I am sure it is
> not configuration issue because once I configured new ospf process id on
> both the router with the network statement they form neighborship.
> I have not changed any other line in configuration.
>
> I heard from someone that there is some bug and been advised to remove the
> config >>> restart the routers and then reapply the config waiting for
> downtime will do these step and let you guys know if it works.
>
> If anyone else have any suggestion please advise.
>
> Regards
> Aashish Kapoor
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> > It would still be very helpfull if you could post your configs of the
> > interfaces and routing processes of both routers. We are now really
> guessing
> > what could be the problem, but it seems a config problem or something
> with
> > your routers or IOS version.
> > Please post a 'show version' with it as well.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rick Mur
> > CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
> > Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:32 AM, aashish kapoor <
> operationccie_at_gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks everyone I very well know all these stuff that is the only reason
> I
> >> have placed this issue over here
> >> This is wierd and that is the reason I was wondering that if anyone else
> >> has faced this issue
> >> Could someone through some light on why do we need ospf process id.
> >> I hope OSPF designers have throught of something while creating porcess
> id
> >> Thanks for your help
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Aashish Kapoor
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:13 AM, dara tomar <wish2ie_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> From the explanation there is no single point that is indicating the
> >>> conflict.
> >>> As the OSPF process number for ipv4 on multiple router doesn't matter
> in
> >>> forming the adjacency.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Dara
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Nathan Richie <nathanr_at_boice.net
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Can you post your configs?
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> >>>> aashish kapoor
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:14 PM
> >>>> To: Rick Mur
> >>>> Cc: Divin Mathew John; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >>>> Subject: Re: ospf issue
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Rick,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not erased the configuration before rebooting it.
> >>>> Further i am geting error
> >>>> %OSPF: OSPF not enabled on Serial1
> >>>> wherein I have ip address of the interface in the network statement
> and
> >>>> in
> >>>> the interface level command i have entered command
> >>>> ip ospf network point-to-point
> >>>> still i am geting the same error
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > If you ping the other end, no packet loss?
> >>>> > What kind of link is between the 2 routers?
> >>>> > Could you post the OSPF and interface configuration of both routers.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Have you erased the configs of both routers and reloaded them both
> and
> >>>> then
> >>>> > reconfigured this?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Regards,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Rick Mur
> >>>> > CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
> >>>> > Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
> >>>> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
> >>>> http://www.ipexpert.com/>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:50 PM, aashish kapoor <
> >>>> operationccie_at_gmail.com
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Thanks but I have checked all of them they were fine
> >>>> >> I have just got the same network statement in the new process and
> it
> >>>> is
> >>>> >> working
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Regards
> >>>> >> Aashish Kapoor
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Divin Mathew John <
> >>>> divinjohn_at_gmail.com
> >>>> >> >wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > Check the following
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > 1) Area configured on both sides shud match
> >>>> >> > 2) Stub flag shud match
> >>>> >> > 3) Timers shud Match
> >>>> >> > 4) Dr/BDR Election type shud match
> >>>> >> > 5) MTU shud Match
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, aashish kapoor <
> >>>> >> operationccie_at_gmail.com
> >>>> >> > > wrote:
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >> Hi Group,
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> I have faced one issue with ospf.
> >>>> >> >> R1 ------ R2
> >>>> >> >> running point to point ospf were not forming ospf adjacency
> >>>> >> >> I have checked every possible cause and turned debug on only
> >>>> message is
> >>>> >> >> got
> >>>> >> >> was that the far end in dead
> >>>> >> >> I have restarted ospf process..... have remove and added the
> >>>> network
> >>>> >> >> statement again but it did not worked.
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> Then I have removed network statement from the existing ospf
> >>>> process
> >>>> >> and
> >>>> >> >> created a new ospf process and added this statement into it. It
> >>>> worked
> >>>> >> and
> >>>> >> >> formed adjacency.
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> Please advise what could be possible cause.
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> Regards
> >>>> >> >> Aashish Kapoor
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > --
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > Sent from Karnataka, India
> >>>> >> > Vilhjalmur Stefansson <
> >>>> http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1459.html>
> >>>> >> -
> >>>> >> > "What is the difference between unethical and ethical
> advertising?
> >>>> >> Unethical
> >>>> >> > advertising uses...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net