Re: ospf issue

Thanks everyone I very well know all these stuff that is the only reason I
have placed this issue over here
This is wierd and that is the reason I was wondering that if anyone else has
faced this issue
Could someone through some light on why do we need ospf process id.
I hope OSPF designers have throught of something while creating porcess id
Thanks for your help

Regards
Aashish Kapoor

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:13 AM, dara tomar <wish2ie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> From the explanation there is no single point that is indicating the
> conflict.
> As the OSPF process number for ipv4 on multiple router doesn't matter in
> forming the adjacency.
>
> Thanks,
> Dara
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Nathan Richie <nathanr_at_boice.net> wrote:
>
>> Can you post your configs?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> aashish kapoor
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:14 PM
>> To: Rick Mur
>> Cc: Divin Mathew John; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: ospf issue
>>
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> I have not erased the configuration before rebooting it.
>> Further i am geting error
>> %OSPF: OSPF not enabled on Serial1
>> wherein I have ip address of the interface in the network statement and in
>> the interface level command i have entered command
>> ip ospf network point-to-point
>> still i am geting the same error
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>
>> > If you ping the other end, no packet loss?
>> > What kind of link is between the 2 routers?
>> > Could you post the OSPF and interface configuration of both routers.
>> >
>> > Have you erased the configs of both routers and reloaded them both and
>> then
>> > reconfigured this?
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Rick Mur
>> > CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
>> > Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
>> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
>> http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:50 PM, aashish kapoor <
>> operationccie_at_gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks but I have checked all of them they were fine
>> >> I have just got the same network statement in the new process and it is
>> >> working
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Aashish Kapoor
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Divin Mathew John <
>> divinjohn_at_gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Check the following
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) Area configured on both sides shud match
>> >> > 2) Stub flag shud match
>> >> > 3) Timers shud Match
>> >> > 4) Dr/BDR Election type shud match
>> >> > 5) MTU shud Match
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, aashish kapoor <
>> >> operationccie_at_gmail.com
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi Group,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have faced one issue with ospf.
>> >> >> R1 ------ R2
>> >> >> running point to point ospf were not forming ospf adjacency
>> >> >> I have checked every possible cause and turned debug on only message
>> is
>> >> >> got
>> >> >> was that the far end in dead
>> >> >> I have restarted ospf process..... have remove and added the network
>> >> >> statement again but it did not worked.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Then I have removed network statement from the existing ospf process
>> >> and
>> >> >> created a new ospf process and added this statement into it. It
>> worked
>> >> and
>> >> >> formed adjacency.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please advise what could be possible cause.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> Aashish Kapoor
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > Sent from Karnataka, India
>> >> > Vilhjalmur Stefansson <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1459.html
>> >
>> >> -
>> >> > "What is the difference between unethical and ethical advertising?
>> >> Unethical
>> >> > advertising uses...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Sep 30 2009 - 12:02:08 ART